I am blushing thank u sir On Wed, 21 Jan, 2026, 14:28 Markendeya Yeddanapudi, < [email protected]> wrote:
> Rajaram Sir, > Your answer will take at least one week for me to understand.You are the > uncrowned but one of the greatest. > YMS > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:06 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> ATTACHED WORD DOC kr irs 21126 >> >> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 at 07:10, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Mar* >>> >>> Mathematics-Vs-Reality >>> >>> It is said the Absolute Zero cannot exist, because particles do not >>> allow a vacuum to exist and they fill up. But then 2 plus =4, or any >>> mathematics of >>> >>> >>> >>> plus,Minus,Multiplication,Division,Roots etc,possible as particles >>> simply do not allow such exact mathematical operations? >>> >>> Chat Gpt Answer: >>> >>> That’s a thoughtful question, and it touches on an important distinction >>> between *physical reality* and *abstract mathematics*. >>> 1. Why absolute zero is said to be impossible >>> >>> Absolute zero (0 K) is a *physical state*. It refers to particles >>> having the minimum possible thermal motion. It’s considered unattainable >>> because of *physical laws* (quantum mechanics, the uncertainty >>> principle, zero-point energy), not simply because “particles fill the >>> vacuum.” Even in empty space, quantum fields fluctuate, and particles >>> cannot be completely motionless. >>> >>> So this limitation applies to *physical systems*, not to ideas or >>> symbols. >>> ------------------------------ >>> 2. Mathematics does not live in physical space >>> >>> Statements like: >>> >>> - >>> >>> 2 + 2 = 4 >>> - >>> >>> √9 = 3 >>> - >>> >>> 7 × 8 = 56 >>> >>> are *abstract relationships*, not physical processes. >>> >>> When we say *2 + 2 = 4*, we are not describing particles colliding or >>> moving. We are describing relationships between *abstract entities* >>> defined by axioms (rules). These entities: >>> >>> - >>> >>> Have no mass >>> - >>> >>> Have no position >>> - >>> >>> Do not exist in space or time >>> - >>> >>> Are not affected by particles, vacuum, temperature, or noise >>> >>> So there is *nothing physical that can interfere* with the truth of a >>> mathematical statement. >>> ------------------------------ >>> 3. Physical calculation vs mathematical truth >>> >>> There *is* a subtle but important distinction: >>> 🔹 Mathematical truth >>> >>> - >>> >>> Always exact >>> - >>> >>> Independent of the universe >>> - >>> >>> True even if no physical universe existed >>> >>> Even if there were no particles at all, 2 + 2 would still equal 4. >>> >>> 🔹 Physical computation >>> >>> - >>> >>> Done using real objects (brains, computers, paper, electrons) >>> - >>> >>> Subject to noise, errors, thermal effects, cosmic rays, etc. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> - >>> >>> A computer might flip a bit due to radiation >>> - >>> >>> A human might make a mistake while calculating >>> >>> But these errors affect *our implementation*, not the *mathematics >>> itself*. >>> ------------------------------ >>> 4. An analogy >>> >>> Think of mathematics like the rules of chess. >>> >>> - >>> >>> The rule “a rook moves in straight lines” is always true. >>> - >>> >>> A real chessboard can be damaged, blown away, or melted. >>> - >>> >>> The rule itself remains unchanged and unaffected. >>> >>> Similarly: >>> >>> - >>> >>> The universe may have particles everywhere. >>> - >>> >>> Physical systems have limits. >>> - >>> >>> Mathematical truths remain exact and untouched. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> 5. Bottom line >>> >>> No contradiction exists. >>> >>> - >>> >>> ❌ Absolute zero is impossible because of *physical laws* >>> - >>> >>> ✅ Mathematical operations are always possible because they are *abstract >>> truths* >>> - >>> >>> ❌ Particles do not “interfere” with mathematics >>> - >>> >>> ✅ They only interfere with *physical attempts to compute or measure* >>> >>> So yes—*2 + 2 = 4 is always true*, regardless of particles, vacuum, >>> temperature, or the structure of the universe. >>> >>> If you’d like, we can also explore *why mathematics is so uncannily >>> effective in describing a physical universe that obeys such limits*—a >>> deep and fascinating question. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> > > -- > *Mar* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoomfHDe_ye1POFaKNqNah03LzFg5Bs_wgHNe_jUVDUzLA%40mail.gmail.com.
