-- 
*Mar*

Mathematics-Vs-Reality

It is said the Absolute Zero cannot exist, because particles do not allow a
vacuum to exist and they fill up. But then 2 plus =4, or any mathematics of



plus,Minus,Multiplication,Division,Roots etc,possible as particles simply
do not allow such exact mathematical operations?

Chat Gpt Answer:

That’s a thoughtful question, and it touches on an important distinction
between *physical reality* and *abstract mathematics*.
1. Why absolute zero is said to be impossible

Absolute zero (0 K) is a *physical state*. It refers to particles having
the minimum possible thermal motion. It’s considered unattainable because
of *physical laws* (quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle,
zero-point energy), not simply because “particles fill the vacuum.” Even in
empty space, quantum fields fluctuate, and particles cannot be completely
motionless.

So this limitation applies to *physical systems*, not to ideas or symbols.
------------------------------
2. Mathematics does not live in physical space

Statements like:

   -

   2 + 2 = 4
   -

   √9 = 3
   -

   7 × 8 = 56

are *abstract relationships*, not physical processes.

When we say *2 + 2 = 4*, we are not describing particles colliding or
moving. We are describing relationships between *abstract entities* defined
by axioms (rules). These entities:

   -

   Have no mass
   -

   Have no position
   -

   Do not exist in space or time
   -

   Are not affected by particles, vacuum, temperature, or noise

So there is *nothing physical that can interfere* with the truth of a
mathematical statement.
------------------------------
3. Physical calculation vs mathematical truth

There *is* a subtle but important distinction:
🔹 Mathematical truth

   -

   Always exact
   -

   Independent of the universe
   -

   True even if no physical universe existed

Even if there were no particles at all, 2 + 2 would still equal 4.

🔹 Physical computation

   -

   Done using real objects (brains, computers, paper, electrons)
   -

   Subject to noise, errors, thermal effects, cosmic rays, etc.

For example:

   -

   A computer might flip a bit due to radiation
   -

   A human might make a mistake while calculating

But these errors affect *our implementation*, not the *mathematics itself*.
------------------------------
4. An analogy

Think of mathematics like the rules of chess.

   -

   The rule “a rook moves in straight lines” is always true.
   -

   A real chessboard can be damaged, blown away, or melted.
   -

   The rule itself remains unchanged and unaffected.

Similarly:

   -

   The universe may have particles everywhere.
   -

   Physical systems have limits.
   -

   Mathematical truths remain exact and untouched.

------------------------------
5. Bottom line

No contradiction exists.

   -

   ❌ Absolute zero is impossible because of *physical laws*
   -

   ✅ Mathematical operations are always possible because they are *abstract
   truths*
   -

   ❌ Particles do not “interfere” with mathematics
   -

   ✅ They only interfere with *physical attempts to compute or measure*

So yes—*2 + 2 = 4 is always true*, regardless of particles, vacuum,
temperature, or the structure of the universe.

If you’d like, we can also explore *why mathematics is so uncannily
effective in describing a physical universe that obeys such limits*—a deep
and fascinating question.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to