ATTACHED WORD DOC kr irs 21126

On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 at 07:10, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> Mathematics-Vs-Reality
>
> It is said the Absolute Zero cannot exist, because particles do not allow
> a vacuum to exist and they fill up. But then 2 plus =4, or any mathematics
> of
>
>
>
> plus,Minus,Multiplication,Division,Roots etc,possible as particles simply
> do not allow such exact mathematical operations?
>
> Chat Gpt Answer:
>
> That’s a thoughtful question, and it touches on an important distinction
> between *physical reality* and *abstract mathematics*.
> 1. Why absolute zero is said to be impossible
>
> Absolute zero (0 K) is a *physical state*. It refers to particles having
> the minimum possible thermal motion. It’s considered unattainable because
> of *physical laws* (quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle,
> zero-point energy), not simply because “particles fill the vacuum.” Even in
> empty space, quantum fields fluctuate, and particles cannot be completely
> motionless.
>
> So this limitation applies to *physical systems*, not to ideas or symbols.
> ------------------------------
> 2. Mathematics does not live in physical space
>
> Statements like:
>
>    -
>
>    2 + 2 = 4
>    -
>
>    √9 = 3
>    -
>
>    7 × 8 = 56
>
> are *abstract relationships*, not physical processes.
>
> When we say *2 + 2 = 4*, we are not describing particles colliding or
> moving. We are describing relationships between *abstract entities*
> defined by axioms (rules). These entities:
>
>    -
>
>    Have no mass
>    -
>
>    Have no position
>    -
>
>    Do not exist in space or time
>    -
>
>    Are not affected by particles, vacuum, temperature, or noise
>
> So there is *nothing physical that can interfere* with the truth of a
> mathematical statement.
> ------------------------------
> 3. Physical calculation vs mathematical truth
>
> There *is* a subtle but important distinction:
> 🔹 Mathematical truth
>
>    -
>
>    Always exact
>    -
>
>    Independent of the universe
>    -
>
>    True even if no physical universe existed
>
> Even if there were no particles at all, 2 + 2 would still equal 4.
>
> 🔹 Physical computation
>
>    -
>
>    Done using real objects (brains, computers, paper, electrons)
>    -
>
>    Subject to noise, errors, thermal effects, cosmic rays, etc.
>
> For example:
>
>    -
>
>    A computer might flip a bit due to radiation
>    -
>
>    A human might make a mistake while calculating
>
> But these errors affect *our implementation*, not the *mathematics itself*
> .
> ------------------------------
> 4. An analogy
>
> Think of mathematics like the rules of chess.
>
>    -
>
>    The rule “a rook moves in straight lines” is always true.
>    -
>
>    A real chessboard can be damaged, blown away, or melted.
>    -
>
>    The rule itself remains unchanged and unaffected.
>
> Similarly:
>
>    -
>
>    The universe may have particles everywhere.
>    -
>
>    Physical systems have limits.
>    -
>
>    Mathematical truths remain exact and untouched.
>
> ------------------------------
> 5. Bottom line
>
> No contradiction exists.
>
>    -
>
>    ❌ Absolute zero is impossible because of *physical laws*
>    -
>
>    ✅ Mathematical operations are always possible because they are *abstract
>    truths*
>    -
>
>    ❌ Particles do not “interfere” with mathematics
>    -
>
>    ✅ They only interfere with *physical attempts to compute or measure*
>
> So yes—*2 + 2 = 4 is always true*, regardless of particles, vacuum,
> temperature, or the structure of the universe.
>
> If you’d like, we can also explore *why mathematics is so uncannily
> effective in describing a physical universe that obeys such limits*—a
> deep and fascinating question.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo0zjPPg706S_TzuABiEXSJJLmzCFzChbdA33hgkPLvqA%40mail.gmail.com.

Attachment: PHYSICS PHILOSOPHY AND EPISTOMOLOGY.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

Reply via email to