This idiot Narayana sirs, always like frogs gets hit and never feels ashamed; Parkinson law either he should have read fully or if he had not read start reading it and then answer; seeing the net and quoting the net always lands him as usual , not only in trouble; but also exhibiting his as usual ignorance is exposed; and his pretension tricks are also exposed . Those who knew about the book may write so; it is an extracted page of the book; because Narayana idiot name was there, he got furled up. Good day Te Narayana. Should you lose your respect so badly and still reveal your zero know-how? KR IRS 11324
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 21:12 Subject: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Parkinson's law an extract To: <[email protected]>, iyer <[email protected]>, Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]>, gopala krishnan < [email protected]> Cc: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Dear folks Our indomitable super-ignoramus starts off his brainless voluminous copy-pasting, with his usual screeching, screaming, and shouting:- "*PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT* *ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324*" The uneducated dolt, unmitigated fool and incorrigible idiot does not know that Parkinson's Law merely states that work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion. It has nothing to do with whether the French prefer legislators to sit in a circle, or whether the British prefer two benches of Members facing each other in Parliament. S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:58 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: > PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT > > ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324 > > In France the initial mistake was made of seating the representatives in > a semicircle, all facing the chair. The resulting confusion could be > imagined if it were not notorious. No real opposing teams could be formed > and no one could tell (without listening) which argument was the more > cogent. There was the further handicap of all the proceedings being in > French— an example the United States wisely refused to follow. But the > French system is bad enough even when the linguistic difficulty does not > arise. Instead of having two sides, one in the right and the other in the > wrong— so that the issue is clear from the outset— the French form a > multitude of teams facing in all directions. With the field in such > confusion, the game cannot even begin. Basically their representatives are > of the Right or of the Left, according to where they sit. This is a > perfectly sound scheme. The French have not gone to the extreme of seating > people in alphabetical order. But the semicircular chamber allows of > subtle distinctions between the various degrees of tightness and > leftness. There is none of the clear-cut British distinction between > rightness and wrongness. > > One deputy is described, politically, as to the left of Monsieur Until but > well to the right of Monsieur Quelque chose. What is anyone to make of > that? What should we make of it even in English? What do they make of it > themselves? The answer is, "Nothing." > > All this is generally known. What is less generally recognized is that the > paramount importance of the seating 16 plan applies to other assemblies and > meetings, international, national, and local. It applies, moreover, to > meetings round a table such as occur at a Round Table Conference. A > moment's thought will convince us that a Square Table Conference would be > something totally different and a Long Table Conference would be different > again. > > These differences do not merely affect the length and acrimony of the > discussion; they also affect what (if anything) is decided. Rarely, as we > know, will the voting relate to the merits of the case. The final decision > is influenced by a variety of factors, few of which need concern us at the > moment. We should note, however, that the issue is actually decided, in the > end, by the votes of the center bloc. This would not be true in the House > of Commons, where no such bloc is allowed to develop. But at other > conferences the center bloc is all important. This bloc essentially > comprises the following elements: > > a. Those who have failed to master any one of the memoranda written in > advance and showered weeks beforehand on all those who are expected to be > present. > > b. Those who are too stupid to follow the proceedings at all. These are > readily distinguishable by their tendency to mutter to each other: "What is > the fellow talking about?" > > c. Those who are deaf They sit with their hands cupping their ears, > growling "I wish people would speak up." > > d. Those who were dead drunk in the small hours and have turned up (heaven > knows why) with a splitting headache and a conviction that nothing matters > either way. > > e. The senile, whose chief pride is in being as fit as ever— fitter indeed > than a lot of these younger men. "I 11 walked here," they whisper. "Pretty > good for a man of eighty-two, what?" > > f The feeble, who have weakly promised to support both sides and don't > know what to do about it. They are of two minds as to whether they should > abstain from voting or pretend to be sick. > > Toward capturing the votes of the center bloc the first step is to > identify and count the members. That done, everything else depends on where > they are to sit. The best technique is to detail off known and stalwart > supporters to enter into conversation with named middle-bloc types before > the meeting actually begins. In this preliminary chat the stalwarts will > carefully avoid mentioning the main subject of debate. They will be trained > to use the opening gambits listed below, corresponding to the categories a > to /, into which the middle bloc naturally falls: > > a. "Waste of time, I call it, producing all these documents. I have thrown > most of mine away." > > b. "I expect we shall be dazzled by eloquence before long. I often wish > people would talk less and come to the point. They are half too clever, if > you ask me." > > c. "The acoustics of this hall are simply terrible. You would have thought > these scientific chaps could do something about it. For half the time I > CAN'T HEAR WHAT IS BEING SAID. CAN YOU?" > > d. "What a rotten place to meet! I think there is something wrong with the > ventilation. It makes me feel almost unwell. What about you?" > > e. "My goodness, I don't know how you do it! Tell me the secret. Is it > what you have for breakfast?" > > f "There's so much to be said on both sides of the 18 questions that I > really don't know which side to support. What do you feel about it?" > > If these gambits are correctly played, each stalwart will start a lively > conversation, in the midst of which he vows steer his middle-blockman > toward the forum. As he does this, another stalwart will place himself just > ahead of the pair and moving in the same direction. The drill is best > illustrated by a concrete example. > > We will suppose that stalwart X (Mr.Sturdy) is steering middle-blossman Y > (Mr. Waverley, type f) toward a seat near the front. Ahead goes stalwart Z > (Mr. Staunch), who presently takes a seat without appearing to notice the > two men following him. Staunch turns in the opposite direction and waves to > someone in the distance. Then he leans over to make a few remarks to the > man in front of him. Only when Waverley has sat down will Staunch presently > turn toward him and say, "My dear fellow— how nice to see you!" Only some > minutes later again will he catch sight of Sturdy and start visibly with > surprise. "Hallo, Sturdy— I didn't think you would be here!" "I've > recovered now," replies Sturdy. "It was only a chill. " The seating order > is thus made to appear completely accidental, casual, and friendly. That > completes Phase I of the operation, and it would be much the same whatever > the exact category in which the middle-blockman is believed to fall. > > > > Phase II has to be adjusted according to the character of the man to be > influenced. In the case of Waverley (Type f) the object in Phase II is to > avoid any discussion of the matter at issue but to produce the impression > that the thing is already decided. Seated near the front, Waverley will be > unable to see much of the other members and 19 can be given the impression > that they practically all think alike. > > "Really," says Sturdy, "I don't know why I bothered to come. I gather that > Item Four is pretty well agreed. All the fellows I meet seem to have made > up their minds to vote for it." (Or against it, as the case may be.) > "Curious," says Staunch. "I was just going to say the same thing. The > > issue hardly seems to be in doubt." > > "I had not really made up my own mind," says Sturdy. 20 "There was much to > be said on either side. But opposition would really be a waste of time. > > What do you think, Waverley?" > > "Well," says Waverley, "I must admit that I find the question rather > baffling. On the one hand, there is good reason to agree to the motion ... > > As against that... Do you think it will pass?" > > "My dear Waverley, I would trust your judgment in this. You were saying > just now that it is already agreed. " > > "Oh, was I? Well, there does seem to be a majority. ... Or perhaps I > should say ..." > > "Thank you, Waverley," says Staunch, "for your opinion. I think just the > same but am particularly interested to find you agree with me. There is no > one whose opinion I value more." > > Sturdy, meanwhile, is leaning over to talk to someone in the row behind. > What he actually says, in a low voice, is this, "How is your wife now? Is > she out of the hospital?" When he turns back again, however, it is to > announce that the people behind all think the same. The motion is as good > as passed. And so it is if the drill goes according to plan. > > While the other side has been busy preparing speeches and phrasing > amendments, the side with the superior technique will have concentrated on > pinning each middle-blockman between two reliable supporters. When the > crucial moment comes, the raising of a hand on either side will practically > compel the waverer to follow suit. Should he be actually asleep, as often > happens with middle-blockman in categories d and e, his hand will be raised > for him by the member on his right. This rule is merely to obviate both his > hands being raised; a gesture that has been known to attract unfavourable > comment. With the middle bloc thus secured, the motion will be carried with > a comfortable margin; or else rejected, if that is thought preferable. In > nearly every matter of controversy to be decided by the will of the people, > we can assume that the people who will decide are members of the middle > bloc. Delivery of speeches is therefore a waste of time. > > K Rajaram IRS 11324 > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopoR_G6sFwYGKDm%2B_FgbVkpdt40N-nFpBQ2p1j%2B1tJ3VQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopoR_G6sFwYGKDm%2B_FgbVkpdt40N-nFpBQ2p1j%2B1tJ3VQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iyer123" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOX6w-HSL-bNmzHQuWqAQedWyNrLG7xFuS2d%3D%2B1Bky%2Bzw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOX6w-HSL-bNmzHQuWqAQedWyNrLG7xFuS2d%3D%2B1Bky%2Bzw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoov71nF_G85K04x-iDa4LgXe4M9JMM%3D6KW8wAruogsuig%40mail.gmail.com.
