On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:55 +0300, Olli Salli wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Andre Moreira Magalhaes > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please split your changes in 2 branches one for Tube specific changes > > and the other one on top of you tube branch to implement StreamTube. > > This way we can merge one while the other is still being implemented if > > needed. Also DBusTube should be on top of the tube branch in case > > someone is implementing it. > > Won't this be excessively hard now? The Tube class isn't really that > useful on its own anyway and needs a proof-of-concept concrete > subclass (*StreamTubeChannel) for the merge anyway. And I don't think > we have the problem of the DBusTube work magically getting ahead of > the stream tube merge ;) If you think it's hard to do it, you can ignore it, it's not critical anyway. I don't know how DBusTube work is progressing (if any), so if you believe this is unnecessary ignore it and close the Tube/StreamTube bugs when merging the high-level-tubes branch.
BR -- Andre Moreira Magalhaes (andrunko) -------------------------------------------------------- Jabber: [email protected] MSN: [email protected] Skype: andrunko IRC: andrunko Blog: http://andrunko.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy
