> On 2 Dec 2015, at 8:49 PM, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:07:40AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >> On 02/12/15(Wed) 10:25, Claudio Jeker wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >>>> Make sure if_output() and if_start() will never be called for the >>>> bridge(4). >>>> >>>> Concerns? >>> >>> Why not use if_detached_start()? There is no if_detached_output() but we >>> could add that as well. I would prefer that over NULL pointers that may >>> get hit. >> >> I'd like to get rid of if_detached_start(), hit the NULL pointers and >> fix the bugs. >> > > Good luck. Esp. with alternate queuing disciplines and if flight packets.
if you IFQ_PURGE(&ifp->if_snd) first then there's no in flight packets anymore.
