On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:07:40AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 02/12/15(Wed) 10:25, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > Make sure if_output() and if_start() will never be called for the > > > bridge(4). > > > > > > Concerns? > > > > Why not use if_detached_start()? There is no if_detached_output() but we > > could add that as well. I would prefer that over NULL pointers that may > > get hit. > > I'd like to get rid of if_detached_start(), hit the NULL pointers and > fix the bugs. >
Good luck. Esp. with alternate queuing disciplines and if flight packets. -- :wq Claudio
