On 02/12/15(Wed) 10:25, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > Make sure if_output() and if_start() will never be called for the > > bridge(4). > > > > Concerns? > > Why not use if_detached_start()? There is no if_detached_output() but we > could add that as well. I would prefer that over NULL pointers that may > get hit.
I'd like to get rid of if_detached_start(), hit the NULL pointers and fix the bugs.
