Does anybody tested Ganglia with JMXTrans at production environment for SolrCloud?
2013/4/26 Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com> > Alan, Shawn, > > If backporting to 3.x is hard, no worries, we don't necessarily require the > patch as we are heading to 4.x eventually. It is just much easier within > our organization to test on the existing solr 3.4 as there are a few of > internal dependencies and custom code on top of solr. Also solr upgrades on > production systems are usually pushed forward by a month or so starting the > upgrade on development systems (requires lots of testing and > verifications). > > Nevertheless, it is good effort to make #solr #graphite friendly, so keep > it up! :) > > Dmitry > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > > On 4/25/2013 6:30 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > > We are very much interested in 3.4. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> > wrote: > > >> This is on top of trunk at the moment, but would be back ported to 4.4 > > if > > >> there was interest. > > > > This will be bad news, I'm sorry: > > > > All remaining work on 3.x versions happens in the 3.6 branch. This > > branch is in maintenance mode. It will only get fixes for serious bugs > > with no workaround. Improvements and new features won't be considered > > at all. > > > > You're welcome to try backporting patches from newer issues. Due to the > > major differences in the 3x and 4x codebases, the best case scenario is > > that you'll be facing a very manual task. Some changes can't be > > backported because they rely on other features only found in 4.x code. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > > > >
