Is this planned as a future feature? Is it in the bug tracker as a feature yet..just wondering how long until it is a feature. I could live without price counts for a bit.
Sent from my phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Martijn v Groningen-2 [via Lucene]" <ml-node+s472066n3897768...@n3.nabble.com> Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 3:31 pm Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) To: "danjfoley" <d...@micamedia.com> The group.facet option only works for field facets (facet.field). Others facets types (query, range and pivot) aren't supported yet. The group.facet works for both single and multivalued fields specified in the facet.field parameter. Martijn On 9 April 2012 20:58, danjfoley <d...@micamedia.com> wrote: > I am using group.facet and it works fine for regular facet.field but not > for facet.query > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Young, Cody [via Lucene]" <ml-node+s472066n3897487...@n3.nabble.com > > > Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 1:38 pm > Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > To: "danjfoley" <d...@micamedia.com> > > > > One other thing, I believe that you need to be using facet.field on single > valued string fields for group.facet to function properly. Are the fields > you're faceting on multiValued=false? > > Cody > > -----Original Message----- > From: Young, Cody [mailto:cody.yo...@move.com] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:36 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > You tried adding the parameter > > &group.facet=true ? > > Cody > > -----Original Message----- > From: danjfoley [mailto:d...@micamedia.com] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:09 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > I did get this working with version 4. However my facet queries still > don't group. > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Young, Cody [via Lucene]" <ml-node+s472066n3897366...@n3.nabble.com > > > Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 12:45 pm > Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > To: "danjfoley" <d...@micamedia.com> > > > > I believe you're looking for what's called, "Matrix Counts" > > Please see this JIRA issue. To my knowledge it has been committed in trunk > but not 3.x. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898 > > This feature is accessed by using group.facet=true > > Cody > > -----Original Message----- > From: danjfoley [mailto:d...@micamedia.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:02 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > I've been searching for a solution to my issue, and this seems to come > closest to it. But not exactly. > > I am indexing clothing. Each article of clothing comes in many sizes and > colors, and can belong to any number of categories. > > For example take the following: I add 6 documents to solr as follows: > > product, color, size, category > > shirt A, red, small, valentines day > shirt A, red, large, valentines day > shirt A, blue, small, valentines day > shirt A, blue, large, valentines day > shirt A, green, small, valentines day > shirt A, green, large, valentines day > > I'd like my facet counts to return as follows: > > color > > red (1) > blue (1) > green (1) > > size > > small (1) > large (1) > > category > > valentines day (1) > > But they come back like this: > > color: > red (2) > blue (2) > green (2) > > size: > small (2) > large (2) > > category > valentines day (6) > > I see the group.facet parameter in version 4.0 does exactly this. However > how can I make this happen now? There are all sorts of ecommerce systems > out there that facet exactly how i'm asking. i thought solr is supposed to > be the very best fastest search system, yet it doesn't seem to be able to > facet correct for items with multiple values? > > Am i indexing my data wrong? > > how can i make this happen? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3893744.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897366.html > > To unsubscribe from To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. > facet, visit > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3838797&code=ZGFuQG1pY2FtZWRpYS5jb218MzgzODc5N3wtMTEyNjQzODIyNg== > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897422.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897487.html > > To unsubscribe from To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. > facet, visit > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_c -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3898537.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
