Good idea. In fact you could fake anything this way. Pre-render the facet values on input.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Young, Cody [via Lucene] < ml-node+s472066n3900432...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > You may be able to fake your price requirements by rounding at index time. > > For instance, if you wanted 10-19$, 20-29$, 30+ then you create a second > price field specifically for faceting, round down to 10, 20, 30 at index > time and then facet on that field. > > Cody > > -----Original Message----- > From: danjfoley [mailto:[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=0>] > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 7:26 PM > To: [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=1> > Subject: Re: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > Is this planned as a future feature? Is it in the bug tracker as a feature > yet..just wondering how long until it is a feature. I could live without > price counts for a bit. > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Martijn v Groningen-2 [via Lucene]" <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=2>> > > Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 3:31 pm > Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > To: "danjfoley" <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=3>> > > > > > The group.facet option only works for field facets (facet.field). Others > facets types (query, range and pivot) aren't supported yet. > The group.facet works for both single and multivalued fields specified in > the facet.field parameter. > > Martijn > > On 9 April 2012 20:58, danjfoley <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=4>> > wrote: > > > I am using group.facet and it works fine for regular facet.field but > > not for facet.query > > > > Sent from my phone > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > > From: "Young, Cody [via Lucene]" > > <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=5> > > > > > Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 1:38 pm > > Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > To: "danjfoley" <[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=6>> > > > > > > > > > One other thing, I believe that you need to be using facet.field on > > single valued string fields for group.facet to function properly. Are > > the fields you're faceting on multiValued=false? > > > > Cody > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Young, Cody [mailto:[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=7>] > > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:36 AM > > To: [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=8> > > Subject: RE: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > > > You tried adding the parameter > > > > &group.facet=true ? > > > > Cody > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: danjfoley [mailto:[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=9>] > > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:09 AM > > To: [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=10> > > Subject: Re: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > > > I did get this working with version 4. However my facet queries still > > don't group. > > > > Sent from my phone > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > > From: "Young, Cody [via Lucene]" > > <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=11> > > > > > Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 12:45 pm > > Subject: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > To: "danjfoley" <[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=12>> > > > > > > > > > I believe you're looking for what's called, "Matrix Counts" > > > > Please see this JIRA issue. To my knowledge it has been committed in > > trunk but not 3.x. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898 > > > > This feature is accessed by using group.facet=true > > > > Cody > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: danjfoley [mailto:[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=13>] > > > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:02 PM > > To: [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3900432&i=14> > > Subject: Re: To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. facet) > > > > I've been searching for a solution to my issue, and this seems to come > > closest to it. But not exactly. > > > > I am indexing clothing. Each article of clothing comes in many sizes > > and colors, and can belong to any number of categories. > > > > For example take the following: I add 6 documents to solr as follows: > > > > product, color, size, category > > > > shirt A, red, small, valentines day > > shirt A, red, large, valentines day > > shirt A, blue, small, valentines day > > shirt A, blue, large, valentines day > > shirt A, green, small, valentines day > > shirt A, green, large, valentines day > > > > I'd like my facet counts to return as follows: > > > > color > > > > red (1) > > blue (1) > > green (1) > > > > size > > > > small (1) > > large (1) > > > > category > > > > valentines day (1) > > > > But they come back like this: > > > > color: > > red (2) > > blue (2) > > green (2) > > > > size: > > small (2) > > large (2) > > > > category > > valentines day (6) > > > > I see the group.facet parameter in version 4.0 does exactly this. > > However how can I make this happen now? There are all sorts of > > ecommerce systems out there that facet exactly how i'm asking. i > > thought solr is supposed to be the very best fastest search system, > > yet it doesn't seem to be able to facet correct for items with multiple > values? > > > > Am i indexing my data wrong? > > > > how can i make this happen? > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-grou > > p-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3893744.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > > discussion > > below: > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-grou > > p-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897366.html > > > > To unsubscribe from To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. > > facet, visit > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsu > > bscribe_by_code&node=3838797&code=ZGFuQG1pY2FtZWRpYS5jb218MzgzODc5N3wt > > MTEyNjQzODIyNg== > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-grou > > p-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897422.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > > discussion > > below: > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-grou > > p-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3897487.html > > > > To unsubscribe from To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. > > facet, visit > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsu > > bscribe_by_c > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3898537.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3900432.html > To unsubscribe from To truncate or not to truncate (group.truncate vs. > facet), click > here<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3838797&code=ZGFuQG1pY2FtZWRpYS5jb218MzgzODc5N3wtMTEyNjQzODIyNg==> > . > NAML<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- Dan Foley Owner - PHP Web Developer _______________________________________________________ Micamedia.com - PHP Web Development -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3900517.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
