Faceting is orthogonal to grouping, so be careful what you ask for. So adding faceting would be easy, the only reason I suggested grouping is your requirement that your brands be just a count of the number of distinct ones found, not the number of matching docs.
So a really simple solution would be to forget about grouping and just facet. Then have your application change the counts for all the "brand" entries to 1. Best Erick On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:23 PM, rasser <r...@vertica.dk> wrote: > I see your point. > > If I understand it correct it will however mean that i need to return > 10(brands)x100(resultToShow) = 1000 docs to facilitate that all 100 results > to show is of the same brand. Correnct? > > And tomorrow (or later) the customer will also want a facet on 5 new fields > eg. "production year". How could this be handled with the above approach? > > Thanks > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-truncate-or-not-to-truncate-group-truncate-vs-facet-tp3838797p3840406.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
