Can you just do q=autoCompleteHelper2:caf to see you get results? Cheers Avlesh
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:53 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yup, it is. Both are copied from another field called name. > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Lame question, but are you populating data in the autoCompleteHelper2 > > field? > > > > Cheers > > Avlesh > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The problem is, I'm getting equal scores for this: > > > Query: > > > q=(autoCompleteHelper2:caf^10.0 autoCompleteHelper:caf) > > > > > > Partial Result: > > > > > > <doc> > > > <float name="score">0.7821733</float> > > > <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Bikes Café</str> > > > </doc> > > > > > > <doc> > > > <float name="score">0.7821733</float> > > > <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Cafe Feliy</str> > > > </doc> > > > > > > I'm using the standard request handler with this. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rih > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Avlesh, > > > > I don't see anything wrong with the data from analysis. > > > > > > > > KeywordTokenized: > > > > > > > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** > **9** > > > ** > > > > 10** **11** **12** **13** **14** **15** **16** **...* > > > > *term text ** **th** **he** **e ** **c** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp** > > > **pi* > > > > * **io** **on** **the** **he ** **e c** **ch** **cha** **...* > > > > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** > > > **word > > > > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** > > > **word** > > > > **word** **...* > > > > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4** **3,5** **4,6** **5,7** > > > **6,8 > > > > ** **7,9** **8,10** **9,11** **10,12** **0,3** **1,4** **2,5** > **3,6** > > ** > > > > ...* > > > > > > > > WhitespaceTokenized: > > > > > > > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** > **9** > > > ** > > > > 10** **11** **...* > > > > *term text ** **th** **he** **the** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp** > **pi** > > ** > > > > io** **on** **cha** **...* > > > > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** > > > **word > > > > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **...* > > > > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **0,3** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4** > > > **3,5 > > > > ** **4,6** **5,7** **6,8** **...* > > > > > > > > Is term position considered during scoring? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rih > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Use the field analysis tool to see how the data is being analyzed in > > > both > > > >> the fields. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers > > > >> Avlesh > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hmm... I don't quite get the desired results. Those starting with > > > "cha" > > > >> are > > > >> > now randomly ordered. Is there something wrong with the filters I > > > >> applied? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Filters? I did not mean filters at all. > > > >> > > I am in a mad rush right now, but on the face of it your field > > > >> > definitions > > > >> > > look right. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > This is what I asked for - > > > >> > > q=(autoComplete2:cha^10 autoComplete:cha) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Lemme know if this does not work for you. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Cheers > > > >> > > Avlesh > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi Avlesh, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I can't seem to get the scores right. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I now have these types for the fields I'm targeting, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > <fieldType name="autoComplete" class="solr.TextField" > > > >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1"> > > > >> > > > <analyzer type="index"> > > > >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1" > > > >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/> > > > >> > > > </analyzer> > > > >> > > > <analyzer type="query"> > > > >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> > > > >> > > > </analyzer> > > > >> > > > </fieldType> > > > >> > > > <fieldType name="autoComplete2" class="solr.TextField" > > > >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1"> > > > >> > > > <analyzer type="index"> > > > >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1" > > > >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/> > > > >> > > > </analyzer> > > > >> > > > <analyzer type="query"> > > > >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > > > >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> > > > >> > > > </analyzer> > > > >> > > > </fieldType> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > My query is this, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > q=*:*&fq=autoCompleteHelper:cha+autoCompleteHelper2:cha&qf=autoCompleteHelper^10.0+autoCompleteHelper2^1.0 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > What should I tweak from the above config and query? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > Rih > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I will have to pass on this and try your suggestion first. > So, > > > how > > > >> > does > > > >> > > > > your suggestion (1 and 2) boost the my startswith query? Is > it > > > >> > because > > > >> > > of > > > >> > > > > the n-gram filter? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Sandeep Tagore < > > > >> > > sandeep.tag...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Yes it can be done but it needs some customization. Search > > for > > > >> > custom > > > >> > > > sort > > > >> > > > >> implementations/discussions. > > > >> > > > >> You can check... > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html > > > >> > > > >> . > > > >> > > > >> Let us know if you have any issues. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Sandeep > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> R. Tan wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > This might work and I also have a single value field > which > > > >> makes > > > >> > it > > > >> > > > >> > cleaner. > > > >> > > > >> > Can sort be customized (with indexOf()) from the solr > > > >> parameters > > > >> > > > alone? > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> View this message in context: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Scoring-for-specific-field-queries-tp25798390p25799055.html > > > >> > > > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
