Yup, it is. Both are copied from another field called name.

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lame question, but are you populating data in the autoCompleteHelper2
> field?
>
> Cheers
> Avlesh
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The problem is, I'm getting equal scores for this:
> > Query:
> > q=(autoCompleteHelper2:caf^10.0 autoCompleteHelper:caf)
> >
> > Partial Result:
> >
> > <doc>
> > <float name="score">0.7821733</float>
> > <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Bikes Café</str>
> > </doc>
> >
> > <doc>
> > <float name="score">0.7821733</float>
> > <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Cafe Feliy</str>
> > </doc>
> >
> > I'm using the standard request handler with this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rih
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Avlesh,
> > > I don't see anything wrong with the data from analysis.
> > >
> > > KeywordTokenized:
> > >
> > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** **9**
> > **
> > > 10** **11** **12** **13** **14** **15** **16** **...*
> > > *term text ** **th** **he** **e ** **c** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp**
> > **pi*
> > > * **io** **on** **the** **he ** **e c** **ch** **cha** **...*
> > > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word**
> > **word
> > > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word**
> > **word**
> > > **word** **...*
> > > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4** **3,5** **4,6** **5,7**
> > **6,8
> > > ** **7,9** **8,10** **9,11** **10,12** **0,3** **1,4** **2,5** **3,6**
> **
> > > ...*
> > >
> > > WhitespaceTokenized:
> > >
> > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** **9**
> > **
> > > 10** **11** **...*
> > > *term text ** **th** **he** **the** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp** **pi**
> **
> > > io** **on** **cha** **...*
> > > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word**
> > **word
> > > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **...*
> > > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **0,3** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4**
> > **3,5
> > > ** **4,6** **5,7** **6,8** **...*
> > >
> > > Is term position considered during scoring?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rih
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Use the field analysis tool to see how the data is being analyzed in
> > both
> > >> the fields.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Avlesh
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hmm... I don't quite get the desired results. Those starting with
> > "cha"
> > >> are
> > >> > now randomly ordered. Is there something wrong with the filters I
> > >> applied?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Filters? I did not mean filters at all.
> > >> > > I am in a mad rush right now, but on the face of it your field
> > >> > definitions
> > >> > > look right.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This is what I asked for -
> > >> > > q=(autoComplete2:cha^10 autoComplete:cha)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Lemme know if this does not work for you.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Cheers
> > >> > > Avlesh
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi Avlesh,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I can't seem to get the scores right.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I now have these types for the fields I'm targeting,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > <fieldType name="autoComplete" class="solr.TextField"
> > >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1">
> > >> > > >      <analyzer type="index">
> > >> > > >        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> > >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/>
> > >> > > >      </analyzer>
> > >> > > >      <analyzer type="query">
> > >> > > >        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
> > >> > > >      </analyzer>
> > >> > > >    </fieldType>
> > >> > > >    <fieldType name="autoComplete2" class="solr.TextField"
> > >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1">
> > >> > > >      <analyzer type="index">
> > >> > > >        <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> > >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/>
> > >> > > >      </analyzer>
> > >> > > >      <analyzer type="query">
> > >> > > >        <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >> > > >        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
> > >> > > >      </analyzer>
> > >> > > >    </fieldType>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > My query is this,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> q=*:*&fq=autoCompleteHelper:cha+autoCompleteHelper2:cha&qf=autoCompleteHelper^10.0+autoCompleteHelper2^1.0
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > What should I tweak from the above config and query?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Rih
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I will have to pass on this and try your suggestion first. So,
> > how
> > >> > does
> > >> > > > > your suggestion (1 and 2) boost the my startswith query? Is it
> > >> > because
> > >> > > of
> > >> > > > > the n-gram filter?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Sandeep Tagore <
> > >> > > sandeep.tag...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Yes it can be done but it needs some customization. Search
> for
> > >> > custom
> > >> > > > sort
> > >> > > > >> implementations/discussions.
> > >> > > > >> You can check...
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html
> > >> > > > >> .
> > >> > > > >> Let us know if you have any issues.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Sandeep
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> R. Tan wrote:
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > This might work and I also have a single value field which
> > >> makes
> > >> > it
> > >> > > > >> > cleaner.
> > >> > > > >> > Can sort be customized (with indexOf()) from the solr
> > >> parameters
> > >> > > > alone?
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> --
> > >> > > > >> View this message in context:
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Scoring-for-specific-field-queries-tp25798390p25799055.html
> > >> > > > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to