The problem is, I'm getting equal scores for this: Query: q=(autoCompleteHelper2:caf^10.0 autoCompleteHelper:caf)
Partial Result: <doc> <float name="score">0.7821733</float> <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Bikes Café</str> </doc> <doc> <float name="score">0.7821733</float> <str name="autoCompleteHelper">Cafe Feliy</str> </doc> I'm using the standard request handler with this. Thanks, Rih On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: > Avlesh, > I don't see anything wrong with the data from analysis. > > KeywordTokenized: > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** **9** ** > 10** **11** **12** **13** **14** **15** **16** **...* > *term text ** **th** **he** **e ** **c** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp** **pi* > * **io** **on** **the** **he ** **e c** **ch** **cha** **...* > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** > **word** **...* > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4** **3,5** **4,6** **5,7** **6,8 > ** **7,9** **8,10** **9,11** **10,12** **0,3** **1,4** **2,5** **3,6** ** > ...* > > WhitespaceTokenized: > > *term position ** **1** **2** **3** **4** **5** **6** **7** **8** **9** ** > 10** **11** **...* > *term text ** **th** **he** **the** **ch** **ha** **am** **mp** **pi** ** > io** **on** **cha** **...* > *term type ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word** **word > ** **word** **word** **word** **word** **...* > *source start,end ** **0,2** **1,3** **0,3** **0,2** **1,3** **2,4** **3,5 > ** **4,6** **5,7** **6,8** **...* > > Is term position considered during scoring? > > Thanks, > Rih > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Use the field analysis tool to see how the data is being analyzed in both >> the fields. >> >> Cheers >> Avlesh >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hmm... I don't quite get the desired results. Those starting with "cha" >> are >> > now randomly ordered. Is there something wrong with the filters I >> applied? >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Filters? I did not mean filters at all. >> > > I am in a mad rush right now, but on the face of it your field >> > definitions >> > > look right. >> > > >> > > This is what I asked for - >> > > q=(autoComplete2:cha^10 autoComplete:cha) >> > > >> > > Lemme know if this does not work for you. >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > Avlesh >> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Avlesh, >> > > > >> > > > I can't seem to get the scores right. >> > > > >> > > > I now have these types for the fields I'm targeting, >> > > > >> > > > <fieldType name="autoComplete" class="solr.TextField" >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1"> >> > > > <analyzer type="index"> >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> >> > > > <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1" >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/> >> > > > </analyzer> >> > > > <analyzer type="query"> >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> >> > > > </analyzer> >> > > > </fieldType> >> > > > <fieldType name="autoComplete2" class="solr.TextField" >> > > > positionIncrementGap="1"> >> > > > <analyzer type="index"> >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> >> > > > <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1" >> > > > maxGramSize="20"/> >> > > > </analyzer> >> > > > <analyzer type="query"> >> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> >> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" /> >> > > > </analyzer> >> > > > </fieldType> >> > > > >> > > > My query is this, >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> q=*:*&fq=autoCompleteHelper:cha+autoCompleteHelper2:cha&qf=autoCompleteHelper^10.0+autoCompleteHelper2^1.0 >> > > > >> > > > What should I tweak from the above config and query? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Rih >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I will have to pass on this and try your suggestion first. So, how >> > does >> > > > > your suggestion (1 and 2) boost the my startswith query? Is it >> > because >> > > of >> > > > > the n-gram filter? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Sandeep Tagore < >> > > sandeep.tag...@gmail.com >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Yes it can be done but it needs some customization. Search for >> > custom >> > > > sort >> > > > >> implementations/discussions. >> > > > >> You can check... >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html >> > > > >> . >> > > > >> Let us know if you have any issues. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Sandeep >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> R. Tan wrote: >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > This might work and I also have a single value field which >> makes >> > it >> > > > >> > cleaner. >> > > > >> > Can sort be customized (with indexOf()) from the solr >> parameters >> > > > alone? >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> -- >> > > > >> View this message in context: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://www.nabble.com/Scoring-for-specific-field-queries-tp25798390p25799055.html >> > > > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
