Mike Klaas wrote:
On 6-Oct-08, at 11:20 AM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
It's not a bug in the implementation, it's a side effect of the basic
tenent of how dismax works since it inverts the input and creates a
DisjunctionMaxQuery for each "word" in the input, any word that is
valid in at least one of the "qf" fields generates a "should" clause
that contributes to the MM count.
you guys are going way over my head now.
is there any way i could 'fake' it by adding a second field without
stopwords, or something like that?
Yep, you can "fake" it by only using fieldsets (qf) that have a
consistent set of stopwords.
does that mean changing the query or changing the schema?
i'm sorry, this is all new to me. speak slowly and use words of one
syllable or less, please. :)
-jsd-
