On 6-Oct-08, at 11:20 AM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
It's not a bug in the implementation, it's a side effect of the
basic tenent of how dismax works since it inverts the input and
creates a DisjunctionMaxQuery for each "word" in the input, any
word that is valid in at least one of the "qf" fields generates a
"should" clause that contributes to the MM count.
you guys are going way over my head now.
is there any way i could 'fake' it by adding a second field without
stopwords, or something like that?
Yep, you can "fake" it by only using fieldsets (qf) that have a
consistent set of stopwords.
-Mike
