Chris Hostetter wrote:
It's not a bug in the implementation, it's a side effect of the basic tenent of how dismax works since it inverts the input and creates a DisjunctionMaxQuery for each "word" in the input, any word that is valid in at least one of the "qf" fields generates a "should" clause that contributes to the MM count.
you guys are going way over my head now.is there any way i could 'fake' it by adding a second field without stopwords, or something like that?
-jsd-
