This is what I thought too.

It happened on all 5 really weird behavior. I entirely expected blank
indexes on the replica

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:38 PM Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> I suppose there should be slave configuration in solrconfig files which
> says to ping master to check for the version and get the modified files.
>
> If replication is configured in slave you will see commands getting
> triggered and you could get some idea from there.
>
> Also you could paste that log if it not clear.
>
> Regards,
> Aman
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 23:57 Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > To be clear I deleted the actual index files out from under the running
> > master
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:25 PM Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > So are you saying it should have?
> > >
> > > It really acted like a normal function this happened on 5 different
> pairs
> > > in the same way.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:23 PM Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Could you please check the replication request commands in solr logs
> of
> > >> slave and see if it is complaining anything.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 23:45 Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > This I think is a very simple question.
> > >> >
> > >> > I have a solr 4.3 master slave setup.
> > >> >
> > >> > Simple replication.
> > >> >
> > >> > The master and slave were both running and synchronized up to date
> > >> >
> > >> > I went on the master and deleted the index files while solr was
> > running.
> > >> > solr created new empty index files and continued to serve requests.
> > >> > The slave did not delete its indexes and kept all of the old data in
> > >> place
> > >> > and continued to serve requests.
> > >> >
> > >> > This was strange as I would have thought the replica would have
> > >> replicated
> > >> > an empty index from the master.
> > >> >
> > >> > Does anyone have an explanation for this? I am fairly certain I just
> > am
> > >> not
> > >> > understanding something basic.
> > >> >
> > >> > J
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Jeff Courtade
> > >> > M: 240.507.6116
> > >> >
> > >>
> > > --
> > >
> > > Jeff Courtade
> > > M: 240.507.6116
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Jeff Courtade
> > M: 240.507.6116
> >
>
-- 

Jeff Courtade
M: 240.507.6116

Reply via email to