So are you saying it should have? It really acted like a normal function this happened on 5 different pairs in the same way.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:23 PM Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you please check the replication request commands in solr logs of > slave and see if it is complaining anything. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 23:45 Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This I think is a very simple question. > > > > I have a solr 4.3 master slave setup. > > > > Simple replication. > > > > The master and slave were both running and synchronized up to date > > > > I went on the master and deleted the index files while solr was running. > > solr created new empty index files and continued to serve requests. > > The slave did not delete its indexes and kept all of the old data in > place > > and continued to serve requests. > > > > This was strange as I would have thought the replica would have > replicated > > an empty index from the master. > > > > Does anyone have an explanation for this? I am fairly certain I just am > not > > understanding something basic. > > > > J > > > > -- > > > > Jeff Courtade > > M: 240.507.6116 > > > -- Jeff Courtade M: 240.507.6116
