To be clear I deleted the actual index files out from under the running
master

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:25 PM Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So are you saying it should have?
>
> It really acted like a normal function this happened on 5 different pairs
> in the same way.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:23 PM Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could you please check the replication request commands in solr logs of
>> slave and see if it is complaining anything.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 23:45 Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This I think is a very simple question.
>> >
>> > I have a solr 4.3 master slave setup.
>> >
>> > Simple replication.
>> >
>> > The master and slave were both running and synchronized up to date
>> >
>> > I went on the master and deleted the index files while solr was running.
>> > solr created new empty index files and continued to serve requests.
>> > The slave did not delete its indexes and kept all of the old data in
>> place
>> > and continued to serve requests.
>> >
>> > This was strange as I would have thought the replica would have
>> replicated
>> > an empty index from the master.
>> >
>> > Does anyone have an explanation for this? I am fairly certain I just am
>> not
>> > understanding something basic.
>> >
>> > J
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Jeff Courtade
>> > M: 240.507.6116
>> >
>>
> --
>
> Jeff Courtade
> M: 240.507.6116
>
-- 

Jeff Courtade
M: 240.507.6116

Reply via email to