Thanks for the clarification - I understand now. On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for not being clear. I meant that you can use one OR the other > as and when necessary. You can't use both the styles in one request. > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Could you give me an example how combining standard with dismax would >> look like in query string or URL? >> >> I thought you had to set qt=dismax in the URL and it applied to the >> whole query like: >> >> http://solrserver:8983/solr/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=nik+gene+cluster&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&qt=dismax&wt=ruby&explainOther=&hl.fl= >> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Note that you can use both the standard and dismax style as when you >>> need more control vs. searching all fields. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> So it might be a neat solution. If I am reading this right: >>>> >>>> 1. would make the index larger >>>> 2. means you are searching all fields (or a weighted list) but cannot >>>> also search specific fields at the same time >>>> 3. would make your query string longer but give you the most control >>>> without bloating your index size >>>> >>>> do you think I have the idea or am I missing something? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Ian, >>>>> >>>>> No, the * syntax you mentioned is not supported. However, there are a >>>>> couple of ways of achieving this. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Create a copyField which has all the content and search on that -- >>>>> as you mentioned >>>>> 2. You can use dismax and add all the fields as the search field >>>>> parameter either in the request of the defaults section in >>>>> solrconfig.xml >>>>> 3. You can explictly search for all fields by field:value syntax >>>>> >>>>> To get all terms, you can use the facet.field for all fields and get >>>>> all the terms. However, I'm not able to understand the use-case for >>>>> this. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it possible to have all fields being searched by default? >>>>>> <defaultSearchField>*</defaultSearchField> or something like that. >>>>>> >>>>>> An alternative, is if there is some lucene query that will give me all >>>>>> fields "*:term". >>>>>> >>>>>> My final, more redundant alternative is to create a field called >>>>>> "all_fields" and put everything in there at the end to be the >>>>>> defaultSearchField. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for any advice, >>>>>> Ian Connor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ian Connor >>>> 82 Fellsway W #2 >>>> Somerville, MA 02145 >>>> Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 >>>> Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) >>>> Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 >>>> Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 >>>> Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 >>>> Skype: ian.connor >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Ian Connor >> 82 Fellsway W #2 >> Somerville, MA 02145 >> Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 >> Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) >> Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 >> Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 >> Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 >> Skype: ian.connor >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >
-- Regards, Ian Connor 82 Fellsway W #2 Somerville, MA 02145 Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 Skype: ian.connor
