Could you give me an example how combining standard with dismax would look like in query string or URL?
I thought you had to set qt=dismax in the URL and it applied to the whole query like: http://solrserver:8983/solr/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=nik+gene+cluster&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&qt=dismax&wt=ruby&explainOther=&hl.fl= On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that you can use both the standard and dismax style as when you > need more control vs. searching all fields. > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So it might be a neat solution. If I am reading this right: >> >> 1. would make the index larger >> 2. means you are searching all fields (or a weighted list) but cannot >> also search specific fields at the same time >> 3. would make your query string longer but give you the most control >> without bloating your index size >> >> do you think I have the idea or am I missing something? >> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi Ian, >>> >>> No, the * syntax you mentioned is not supported. However, there are a >>> couple of ways of achieving this. >>> >>> 1. Create a copyField which has all the content and search on that -- >>> as you mentioned >>> 2. You can use dismax and add all the fields as the search field >>> parameter either in the request of the defaults section in >>> solrconfig.xml >>> 3. You can explictly search for all fields by field:value syntax >>> >>> To get all terms, you can use the facet.field for all fields and get >>> all the terms. However, I'm not able to understand the use-case for >>> this. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is it possible to have all fields being searched by default? >>>> <defaultSearchField>*</defaultSearchField> or something like that. >>>> >>>> An alternative, is if there is some lucene query that will give me all >>>> fields "*:term". >>>> >>>> My final, more redundant alternative is to create a field called >>>> "all_fields" and put everything in there at the end to be the >>>> defaultSearchField. >>>> >>>> Thanks for any advice, >>>> Ian Connor >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Ian Connor >> 82 Fellsway W #2 >> Somerville, MA 02145 >> Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 >> Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) >> Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 >> Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 >> Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 >> Skype: ian.connor >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > -- Regards, Ian Connor 82 Fellsway W #2 Somerville, MA 02145 Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 Skype: ian.connor
