Sorry for not being clear. I meant that you can use one OR the other as and when necessary. You can't use both the styles in one request.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you give me an example how combining standard with dismax would > look like in query string or URL? > > I thought you had to set qt=dismax in the URL and it applied to the > whole query like: > > http://solrserver:8983/solr/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=nik+gene+cluster&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&qt=dismax&wt=ruby&explainOther=&hl.fl= > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Note that you can use both the standard and dismax style as when you >> need more control vs. searching all fields. >> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> So it might be a neat solution. If I am reading this right: >>> >>> 1. would make the index larger >>> 2. means you are searching all fields (or a weighted list) but cannot >>> also search specific fields at the same time >>> 3. would make your query string longer but give you the most control >>> without bloating your index size >>> >>> do you think I have the idea or am I missing something? >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hi Ian, >>>> >>>> No, the * syntax you mentioned is not supported. However, there are a >>>> couple of ways of achieving this. >>>> >>>> 1. Create a copyField which has all the content and search on that -- >>>> as you mentioned >>>> 2. You can use dismax and add all the fields as the search field >>>> parameter either in the request of the defaults section in >>>> solrconfig.xml >>>> 3. You can explictly search for all fields by field:value syntax >>>> >>>> To get all terms, you can use the facet.field for all fields and get >>>> all the terms. However, I'm not able to understand the use-case for >>>> this. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to have all fields being searched by default? >>>>> <defaultSearchField>*</defaultSearchField> or something like that. >>>>> >>>>> An alternative, is if there is some lucene query that will give me all >>>>> fields "*:term". >>>>> >>>>> My final, more redundant alternative is to create a field called >>>>> "all_fields" and put everything in there at the end to be the >>>>> defaultSearchField. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any advice, >>>>> Ian Connor >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ian Connor >>> 82 Fellsway W #2 >>> Somerville, MA 02145 >>> Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 >>> Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) >>> Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 >>> Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 >>> Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 >>> Skype: ian.connor >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Ian Connor > 82 Fellsway W #2 > Somerville, MA 02145 > Direct Line: +1 (978) 6333372 > Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) > Mobile Phone: +1 (312) 218 3209 > Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 > Suisse Phone: +41 (0) 22 548 1664 > Skype: ian.connor > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
