Here we go... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-430
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, we could start by adding a JIRA issue to at least request the > feature. > > -Grant > > > On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: > > I can take it up. But should we wait for the feature to 'stabilize' >> before adding it to SolrJ? Till then the approach suggested by Yonik >> (getResponse()) should be fine >> --Noble >> >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hmmm, good point. I had completely forgotten about that route. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Matthew Runo >>> Software Developer >>> Zappos.com >>> 702.943.7833 >>> >>> On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is there any work being done on getting this into SolrJ at the moment? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just a note to those who may be new to SolrJ: you can still access new >>>> or custom functionality in a generic way via getResponse() w/o >>>> explicit SolrJ support. >>>> >>>> -Yonik >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> --Noble Paul >> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > Lucene Helpful Hints: > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
