Right, we could start by adding a JIRA issue to at least request the
feature.
-Grant
On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
I can take it up. But should we wait for the feature to 'stabilize'
before adding it to SolrJ? Till then the approach suggested by Yonik
(getResponse()) should be fine
--Noble
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hmmm, good point. I had completely forgotten about that route.
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
Zappos.com
702.943.7833
On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is there any work being done on getting this into SolrJ at the
moment?
Just a note to those who may be new to SolrJ: you can still access
new
or custom functionality in a generic way via getResponse() w/o
explicit SolrJ support.
-Yonik
--
--Noble Paul
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
