I can take it up. But should we wait for the feature to 'stabilize' before adding it to SolrJ? Till then the approach suggested by Yonik (getResponse()) should be fine --Noble
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, good point. I had completely forgotten about that route. > > Thanks! > > Matthew Runo > Software Developer > Zappos.com > 702.943.7833 > > On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any work being done on getting this into SolrJ at the moment? >> >> Just a note to those who may be new to SolrJ: you can still access new >> or custom functionality in a generic way via getResponse() w/o >> explicit SolrJ support. >> >> -Yonik >> > > -- --Noble Paul
