SolrCoud cluster heavily depends on data locality and high I/O, thus any
NFS with access to disk array over the network is multitude times slower
than direct I/O and must be avoided. Classical JBOD (just a bunch of disks)
config + memory mapped files ensure high performance.

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
wrote:

> My experience was with Solr 1.2 and regular old NFS, so that was probably
> worst case. I was very surprised that it was that bad, though.
>
> So benchmark it before you assume it is fast enough.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/
>
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Toke Eskildsen <t...@statsbiblioteket.dk>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:57 +0100, Gili Nachum wrote:
> >> My data center is out of SAN or local disk storage - is it a big no-no
> to
> >> store Solr core data folder over NAS?
> >
> > It depends on your NAS speed. Both Walter and David are right: It can
> > perform really bad or quite satisfactory. We briefly experimented with
> > using 400GB of Isilon ( http://www.emc.com/isilon ) SSD cache as backend
> > for a searcher. As far as I remember, speed was surprisingly fine; about
> > 3 times slower than with similar local storage. As we needed 20TB+ of
> > index, it would be too expensive for us to use the enterprise NAS system
> > though (long story).
> >
> >> The NAS mount would be accessed by a single machine. I do care about
> >> performance.
> >
> > I have a vision of a off-the-shelf 4-drive box Gorilla-taped to the side
> > of a server rack :-)
> >
> > Or in other words: If the SAN is only to be used by a single machine,
> > this will be more of a kludge than a solid solution. Is it not possible
> > to upgrade local storage to hold the data? How large an index are we
> > talking about?
> >
> >> If I do go with NAS. Should I expect index corruption and other
> oddities?
> >
> > Not that I know of. As the NAS is dedicated, you won't compete for
> > performance there. Do check if your network is fast enough though.
> >
> >
> > - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
> > I highly recommend Gorilla Tape for semi-permanent kludges.
> >
>
>

Reply via email to