Think of Solr/SolrCloud itself as a SAN - smart networked machines that
intensely manage local storage. Have two levels of "SAN" is
counterproductive.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: Gili Nachum
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 4:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: A bad idea to store core data directory over NAS?
My data center is out of SAN or local disk storage - is it a big no-no to
store Solr core data folder over NAS?
That means 1. Lucene index 2. Transaction log.
The NAS mount would be accessed by a single machine. I do care about
performance.
If I do go with NAS. Should I expect index corruption and other oddities?
