I did that once by accident. It was 100X slower. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Nov 4, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Gili Nachum <gilinac...@gmail.com> wrote: > My data center is out of SAN or local disk storage - is it a big no-no to > store Solr core data folder over NAS? > That means 1. Lucene index 2. Transaction log. > > The NAS mount would be accessed by a single machine. I do care about > performance. > > If I do go with NAS. Should I expect index corruption and other oddities?
