And neither project supports the Lucene faceting module, correct?
And the ES web site says: "WARNING: Facets are deprecated and will be
removed in a future release. You are encouraged to migrate to aggregations
instead."
That makes it more of an apples/oranges comparison.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: Toke Eskildsen
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2014 3:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking in the code, I would think the inner loops, the
stuff that really burns CPU cycles, all happens in Lucene, which is the
same for both.
Faceting/Aggregation is implemented independently and with different
designs for Solr and Elasticsearch. I would be surprised if memory
overhead and performance were about the same for this functionality.
- Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
