On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote: > As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of > the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders > that may be lurking in the code, I would think the inner loops, the > stuff that really burns CPU cycles, all happens in Lucene, which is the > same for both.
Faceting/Aggregation is implemented independently and with different designs for Solr and Elasticsearch. I would be surprised if memory overhead and performance were about the same for this functionality. - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
