If performance is the main reason, you can stick with Solr. Both Solr and ES have many knobs to turn for performance, it is impossible to give a direct and correct answer to the question which is faster.
Otis -- Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Salman Akram < salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote: > I did see that earlier. My main concern is search > performance/scalability/throughput which unfortunately that article didn't > address. Any benchmarks or comments about that? > > We are already using SOLR but there has been a push to check elasticsearch. > All the benchmarks I have seen are at least few years old. > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Not super fresh, but more recent than the 2 links you sent: > > > http://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/ > > > > Otis > > -- > > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman Akram < > > salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote: > > > > > This is quite an old discussion. Wanted to check any new comparisons > > after > > > SOLR 4 especially with regards to performance/scalability/throughput? > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Peter <peat...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > > > > > Have a look: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2271600/elasticsearch-sphinx-lucene-solr-xapian-which-fits-for-which-usage > > > > > > > > > > http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/ > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-vs-ElasticSearch-tp3009181p3200492.html > > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Salman Akram > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Salman Akram >