If performance is the main reason, you can stick with Solr.  Both Solr and
ES have many knobs to turn for performance, it is impossible to give a
direct and correct answer to the question which is faster.

Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Salman Akram <
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote:

> I did see that earlier. My main concern is search
> performance/scalability/throughput which unfortunately that article didn't
> address. Any benchmarks or comments about that?
>
> We are already using SOLR but there has been a push to check elasticsearch.
> All the benchmarks I have seen are at least few years old.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Not super fresh, but more recent than the 2 links you sent:
> >
> http://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman Akram <
> > salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote:
> >
> > > This is quite an old discussion. Wanted to check any new comparisons
> > after
> > > SOLR 4 especially with regards to performance/scalability/throughput?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Peter <peat...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Have a look:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2271600/elasticsearch-sphinx-lucene-solr-xapian-which-fits-for-which-usage
> > > >
> > > >
> > http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Peter.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-vs-ElasticSearch-tp3009181p3200492.html
> > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Salman Akram
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Salman Akram
>

Reply via email to