sip-implementors  

Messages by Date

• 2013/01/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] Canceling INVITE Transaction... Gaurav Khare
• 2013/01/21 [Sip-implementors] Keep retransmitting 486 Busy... Vivek Batra
• 2013/01/21 [Sip-implementors] Canceling INVITE Transaction... Vivek Batra
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update is pending deepak bansal
• 2013/01/16 [Sip-implementors] Deadline approaching (was: Registration for SIPit 30 is open) Robert Sparks
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update is pending Pranab Bohra
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update is pending isshed
• 2013/01/16 [Sip-implementors] stateless proxy branch generation Brett Tate
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update is pending Brett Tate
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update ispending Yaswanth Raparti
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update ispending deepak bansal
• 2013/01/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update ispending Shanbhag, Somesh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
• 2013/01/16 [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an Update is pending deepak bansal
• 2013/01/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip conversation satya r
• 2013/01/11 [Sip-implementors] SIP server deployment in network Jitendra Singh
• 2013/01/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Arun kalia
• 2013/01/10 [Sip-implementors] Sending Non-REGISTER Requests in RFC5626 Caixia Liu
• 2013/01/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Olle E Johanson
• 2013/01/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] Received unreliable provisional response before sending PRACK Brett Tate
• 2013/01/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Olle E. Johansson
• 2013/01/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does 200ok Invite, retransmission follow rules of timers H and G? Pranab Bohra
• 2013/01/08 [Sip-implementors] Received unreliable provisional response before sending PRACK 정우섭
• 2013/01/08 [Sip-implementors] Does 200ok Invite, retransmission follow rules of timers H and G? Vivek Singla
• 2013/01/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Paul Kyzivat
• 2013/01/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Arun kalia
• 2013/01/08 [Sip-implementors] SIPit 30 site updated Olle E. Johansson
• 2013/01/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Paul Kyzivat
• 2013/01/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Tarun2 Gupta
• 2013/01/07 [Sip-implementors] Interoperability and conformance testing Arun kalia
• 2013/01/05 [Sip-implementors] sip conversation satya r
• 2013/01/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip conversation Paul Kyzivat
• 2013/01/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip conversation Harsha. R
• 2013/01/03 [Sip-implementors] Multiple nofication upen subscription Carmel Barak
• 2013/01/03 [Sip-implementors] sip conversation satya r
• 2013/01/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar / Presence Server receives SIP message without Max-Forwards Header Brett Tate
• 2013/01/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar / Presence Server receives SIP message without Max-Forwards Header Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2013/01/03 [Sip-implementors] Registrar / Presence Server receives SIP message without Max-Forwards Header Keerthi Srinivasan
• 2013/01/02 [Sip-implementors] Doubt in sip satya r
• 2013/01/02 [Sip-implementors] (no subject) satya r
• 2013/01/02 [Sip-implementors] Appropriate, and inappropriate, use of user=phone. Paul Kyzivat
• 2013/01/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2013/01/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Brett Tate
• 2013/01/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Brett Tate
• 2012/12/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Doubt in sip Joel Gerber
• 2012/12/31 [Sip-implementors] sip refer - dialog reuse Mahudeswaran
• 2012/12/31 [Sip-implementors] Doubt in sip satya testing
• 2012/12/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Theo Zourzouvillys
• 2012/12/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it MUST to have record-route in BYE, if Invite has it Theo Zourzouvillys
• 2012/12/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Harsha. R
• 2012/12/21 [Sip-implementors] Is it MUST to have record-route in BYE, if Invite has it Vivek Singla
• 2012/12/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Vivek Singla
• 2012/12/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Adam Frankel
• 2012/12/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/17 [Sip-implementors] Is " <sip:anonymous.invalid; [email protected]:5060; maddr=10.10.10.10; transport=udp; user=phone>" a valid Contact Header? Adam Frankel
• 2012/12/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Joel Gerber
• 2012/12/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Vivek Singla
• 2012/12/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Joel Gerber
• 2012/12/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/13 [Sip-implementors] Content header : application/isup Vivek Singla
• 2012/12/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] simultaneous use of UDP and TCP Brett Tate
• 2012/12/12 [Sip-implementors] simultaneous use of UDP and TCP Arun kalia
• 2012/12/12 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response. Brett Tate
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response Kamini Gangwani
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response Gaurav Khare
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request-URI Vs to URI Dean Willis
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response Kamini Gangwani
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response. Olle E. Johansson
• 2012/12/11 [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
• 2012/12/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request-URI Vs to URI Olle E. Johansson
• 2012/12/11 [Sip-implementors] Request-URI Vs to URI ikuzar RABE
• 2012/12/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Expires values in SUBSCRIBE Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/10 [Sip-implementors] Regarding Expires values in SUBSCRIBE Santhana Krishnan
• 2012/12/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] branch length in Via field Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/12/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] branch length in Via field Brett Tate
• 2012/12/07 [Sip-implementors] branch length in Via field Aro RANAIVONDRAMBOLA
• 2012/12/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] FQDN length ? Joel Gerber
• 2012/12/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] FQDN length ? Brett Tate
• 2012/12/07 [Sip-implementors] FQDN length ? Aro RANAIVONDRAMBOLA
• 2012/12/06 [Sip-implementors] SIP outbound and contacts Olle E. Johansson
• 2012/11/26 [Sip-implementors] Query a SIP user Antonio Spirandelli
• 2012/11/26 [Sip-implementors] Registration for SIPit 30 is open Robert Sparks
• 2012/11/24 [Sip-implementors] FOSDEM 2013 Telephony/Communications Devroom Call for Presenters Matthew Jordan
• 2012/11/19 [Sip-implementors] Transaction Stateful Proxy Keerthi Srinivasan
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Brett Tate
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Forking Brett Tate
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Nataraju A.B
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Pranab Bohra
• 2012/11/14 [Sip-implementors] SIP Forking Vivek Gupta
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Vivek Gupta
• 2012/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Brett Tate
• 2012/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Jānis Rukšāns
• 2012/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Jānis Rukšāns
• 2012/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Brett Tate
• 2012/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Pranab Bohra
• 2012/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2012/11/06 [Sip-implementors] What will be set in Request-URI with respect to loose and strict routing Vivek Batra
• 2012/11/06 [Sip-implementors] Looking for a Server (Open Source) which supports Instant Message Store and forward Premalatha Rajasekaran
• 2012/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is contact header mandatory for each sip messages? Pranab Bohra
• 2012/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Preksha .
• 2012/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is contact header mandatory for each sip messages? Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2012/11/06 [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request having multiple contact header Keerthi Srinivasan
• 2012/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Help understanding trace Antonio Spirandelli
• 2012/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Help understanding trace Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2012/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Help understanding trace Antonio Spirandelli
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is contact header mandatory for each sip messages? Yaswanth Raparti
• 2012/11/02 [Sip-implementors] Is contact header mandatory for each sip messages? Tamjid Ali
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] To-Tag in REGISTER message Vijay Badola
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] To-Tag in REGISTER message Vijay Badola
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] To-Tag in REGISTER message Partha Ray
• 2012/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] To-Tag in REGISTER message Pranav Damele
• 2012/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] To-Tag in REGISTER message Santosh Iyer
• 2012/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] To-Tag in REGISTER message Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] To-Tag in REGISTER message Vivek Talwar
• 2012/10/30 [Sip-implementors] To-Tag in REGISTER message Keerthi Srinivasan
• 2012/10/29 [Sip-implementors] SIP server intergration with Windows Application Ritwick
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Sip-implementors] Payload type change "on the fly" Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/29 [Sip-implementors] Payload type change "on the fly" kumar.ramadoss
• 2012/10/29 [Sip-implementors] sip source code venkateswarlu Nidamanuri
• 2012/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
• 2012/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
• 2012/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS Brett Tate
• 2012/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS NK
• 2012/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS Brett Tate
• 2012/10/18 [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS NK
• 2012/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Brett Tate
• 2012/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Ashwin Kumar
• 2012/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Aman
• 2012/10/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/16 [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation Frank S.
• 2012/10/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK Brett Tate
• 2012/10/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK Olle E. Johansson
• 2012/10/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK sam.jeyaseelan
• 2012/10/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/10/09 [Sip-implementors] different SDPs in 18x and 200 OK sam.jeyaseelan
• 2012/10/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] BFCP query for content channel Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• 2012/10/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] 403 forbidden response Manivannan S
• 2012/10/04 [Sip-implementors] 403 forbidden response Lohith HS
• 2012/09/28 [Sip-implementors] BFCP query for content channel Gaurav Kumar
• 2012/09/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] Inputs required on Memory leak in RADV code Rakesh Rajkumar
• 2012/09/19 [Sip-implementors] Calling NUMBER display [email protected]
• 2012/09/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Same dynamic payload numbers in rtpmap and fmtp line in SDP for different video codecs Kashif Husain
• 2012/09/17 [Sip-implementors] Same dynamic payload numbers in rtpmap and fmtp line in SDP for different video codecs Gaurav Kumar
• 2012/09/16 [Sip-implementors] A questions a bout the requirements to adapt the SIP client to a device Amir Amininejad
• 2012/09/14 [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding privacy header bumble omap
• 2012/09/14 [Sip-implementors] Doubt regarding privacy header Yaswanth Raparti
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation Brez Borland
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation manju nath
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation Brez Borland
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation manju nath
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation Ozdogru, Kutay
• 2012/09/12 [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation manju nath
• 2012/09/12 Re: [Sip-implementors] Inputs required on Memory leak in RADV code Brez Borland
• 2012/09/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Inputs required on Memory leak in RADV code berat çağlar er
• 2012/09/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Inputs required on Memory leak in RADV code Ozdogru, Kutay
• 2012/09/10 [Sip-implementors] Inputs required on Memory leak in RADV code Rakesh Rajkumar
• 2012/09/09 [Sip-implementors] need help pranab sahoo
• 2012/09/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Call escalation and de-escalation between audio call and video call Balint Menyhart
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Call escalation and de-escalation between audio call and video call Ashwin Kumar
• 2012/09/06 [Sip-implementors] Call escalation and de-escalation between audio call and video call Xu, Fangpo
• 2012/09/06 [Sip-implementors] Regarding SIP Outbound feature implementation manju nath
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] ask for PRACK omitting Require:100rel Alok 2 Tiwari
• 2012/09/03 [Sip-implementors] ask for PRACK omitting Require:100rel Manolis Katsidoniotis
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] regarding user behaviour in REGISTRATION request with contact header having no value Tarun2 Gupta
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] regarding user behaviour in REGISTRATION request with contact header having no value pranab sahoo
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] regarding user behaviour in REGISTRATION request with contact header having no value Tarun2 Gupta
• 2012/09/03 [Sip-implementors] regarding user behaviour in REGISTRATION request with contact header having no value pranab sahoo
• 2012/09/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Race between re-registration and registration expiration Neel Neelakantan
• 2012/08/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to a server is redirect or not. kiran kumar
• 2012/08/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to a server is redirect or not. Paul Kyzivat
• 2012/08/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] query regarding RTP and RTCP Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• 2012/08/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to a server is redirect or not. Brett Tate
• 2012/08/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] Race between re-registration and registration expiration Brett Tate
• 2012/08/27 [Sip-implementors] How to a server is redirect or not. kiran kumar
• 2012/08/27 [Sip-implementors] Race between re-registration and registration expiration Michael Schwarz
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Transport parameter in Contact header Brett Tate
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Transport parameter in Contact header kumar.ramadoss
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Transport parameter in Contact header Brett Tate
• 2012/08/23 [Sip-implementors] Query on Transport parameter in Contact header kumar.ramadoss
• 2012/08/21 [Sip-implementors] query regarding RTP and RTCP pranab sahoo
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reject CANCEL with 481 or statelessly forward? Clayton Hawbaker
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Reject CANCEL with 481 or statelessly forward? Worley, Dale R (Dale)
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Mime parser for ISUP message in SIP body satish agrawal
• 2012/08/20 [Sip-implementors] Reject CANCEL with 481 or statelessly forward? Clayton Hawbaker
• 2012/08/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Mime parser for ISUP message in SIP body Srivastava, Gaurav
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Worley, Dale R (Dale)
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Olle E. Johansson
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Brett Tate
• 2012/08/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Neel Neelakantan
• 2012/08/16 [Sip-implementors] Should a proxy relay a second 200 for a SUBSCRIBE? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• 2012/08/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] Behavior for ACK on local transport errors Brett Tate
• 2012/08/14 [Sip-implementors] Behavior for ACK on local transport errors Brez Borland

• Later messages