Hi Deepak,

If the UPDATE contains neither SDP nor session refress parameter(timer). I
guess you can respond with 200 OK.

What is the harm in replying with 200 Ok in this case?

Thanks.


On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Brett Tate <[email protected]> wrote:

> RFC 3311 section 5.2:
>
> A UAS that receives an UPDATE before it has generated a final
> response to a previous UPDATE on the same dialog MUST return a 500
> response to the new UPDATE, and MUST include a Retry-After header
> field with a randomly chosen value between 0 and 10 seconds.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of deepak bansal
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:16 AM
> > To: sip-implementors
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Processing Update without SDP when an
> > Update is pending
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Could you please help me in below Scenario:
> >
> > How UAS should Process an Update received without SDP when an Update is
> > pending i.e. (Previous update has not been yet sent a Final Response)
> >
> > Secondly, How UAS should Process an Update received with SDP when an
> > Update
> > is pending i.e. (Previous update has not been yet sent a Final
> > Response)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to