On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:24:01 +0800
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 05:03:29PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:22:45AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> > > wayla
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 05:03:29PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:22:45AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> > wayland-protocols. The idea was to start with input-method.xml, text.xml
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:22:45AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> wayland-protocols. The idea was to start with input-method.xml, text.xml,
> linux-dmabuf.xml, presentation_timing.xml, scaler.xml and xdg-shell.xml.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:51:34AM +0200, Jan Arne Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/10/15 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > input-method.xml: This one I think might actually be fine to just apply the
> > naming schema, as the protocol itself has Wayland core principle violations
> > that need to be sol
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:42:24AM +0200, Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 05:59, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:26:45AM +0200, Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 20 October 2015 at 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi again,
> > > >
> > > > I wa
Hi,
On 20 October 2015 at 06:16, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> xdg-shell.xml: Should we bite the bullet and rename this one, or just
>> continue
>> letting its stability state be non-discoverable? It's clearly already used,
>> and
>> renaming
Hi,
On 20/10/15 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> input-method.xml: This one I think might actually be fine to just apply the
> naming schema, as the protocol itself has Wayland core principle violations
> that need to be solved, i.e. any implementor of this is already broken (by
> principle).
>
> text
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Hi again,
... snip ...
> xdg-shell.xml: Should we bite the bullet and rename this one, or just continue
> letting its stability state be non-discoverable? It's clearly already used,
> and
> renaming it will be painful, so not sure about this
On 20 October 2015 at 05:59, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:26:45AM +0200, Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 20 October 2015 at 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> > > wayland-pr
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:26:45AM +0200, Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 October 2015 at 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> > wayland-protocols. The idea was to start with input-method.xml, text.xml,
>
Hi,
On 20 October 2015 at 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
> wayland-protocols. The idea was to start with input-method.xml, text.xml,
> linux-dmabuf.xml, presentation_timing.xml, scaler.xml and xdg-shell.xml.
> The
Hi again,
I was about to start migrating generic protocols away from weston into
wayland-protocols. The idea was to start with input-method.xml, text.xml,
linux-dmabuf.xml, presentation_timing.xml, scaler.xml and xdg-shell.xml. The
question, however, is what to do with the names, because some name
12 matches
Mail list logo