Hi, On 20/10/15 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > input-method.xml: This one I think might actually be fine to just apply the > naming schema, as the protocol itself has Wayland core principle violations > that need to be solved, i.e. any implementor of this is already broken (by > principle). > > text.xml: This one I'm not so sure about. Has it ever been implemented outside > of weston except only as a proof of concept? Would it be fine to use the same > name?
I would suggest to just use zwl_...v1 names for both protocols for now. We can decide later if we want to use a different stable name for them (they both need to be fixed in a non backward compatible way anyways). Regards Jan Arne -- Jan Arne Petersen | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
