On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:51:34AM +0200, Jan Arne Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/10/15 04:22, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > input-method.xml: This one I think might actually be fine to just apply the > > naming schema, as the protocol itself has Wayland core principle violations > > that need to be solved, i.e. any implementor of this is already broken (by > > principle). > > > > text.xml: This one I'm not so sure about. Has it ever been implemented > > outside > > of weston except only as a proof of concept? Would it be fine to use the > > same > > name? > > I would suggest to just use zwl_...v1 names for both protocols for now. > We can decide later if we want to use a different stable name for them > (they both need to be fixed in a non backward compatible way anyways).
Ok. I will try to remember to CC you on the corresponding weston patches that does the renaming so you can ack or review the actual change. Jonas > > Regards > Jan Arne > > -- > Jan Arne Petersen | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company > Tel: +49-30-521325470 > KDAB - The Qt Experts > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
