Re: Issue with SVN Checkout Due to Malformed XML Response

2024-09-10 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tis 10 sep. 2024 kl 22:20 skrev 耗子 : > Dear Subversion Development Team, > I hope this message finds you well. > I am encountering a critical issue when attempting to check out a specific > revision from the WordPress SVN repository. The command I used is: > > svn checkout -r 2983085 > https:/

Re: [ISSUE] Cancelling svn checkout leaves an open file handle

2020-09-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[ Moving to dev@ since earlier replies in the thread moved there. Please un-Cc users@ from replies. ] Uroš Jovanović wrote on Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:31 +0200: > Hi Daniel, > > Not sure what are "relevant pools", I am not really too familiar with SVN :) > The C API manages lifetime of various resou

Re: [ISSUE] Cancelling svn checkout leaves an open file handle

2020-09-08 Thread Uroš Jovanović
Hi Daniel, Not sure what are "relevant pools", I am not really too familiar with SVN :) Attached below is a minimal reproduction case. It is a C# winforms app with Check and Cancel button (.NET 4.8 with SharpSvn 1.9 x64 nuget) You would just need to type in some real svn repo address in Form1.cs

Re: [ISSUE] Cancelling svn checkout leaves an open file handle

2020-09-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Uroš Jovanović wrote on Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:25 +0200: > when using SharpSvn in context of a larger > application, this would mean the user needs to close the entire application > because one unmanaged file handle was left alive. Have you tried clearing the relevant pools? Could you help debugging

Re: Issue with binaries generated(subversion 1.10.2) after compilation on AiX 7.2

2018-12-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Prannoy K.v wrote on Fri, 28 Dec 2018 05:53 +: > > Hi Daniel, > Thank you for your help. I wanted to know if I am doing any mistake > during compilation or is it an Issue with AiX or Subversion ? Did you see the comment in the source code I referred you to? I'm guessing the issue is simply

Re: Issue with binaries generated(subversion 1.10.2) after compilation on AiX 7.2

2018-12-28 Thread Prannoy K.v
Hi Daniel, Thank you for your help. I wanted to know if I am doing any mistake during compilation or is it an Issue with AiX or Subversion ? If it is an issue with AiX and Subversion is it resolved in 1.10.3 or any other versions ?  Thanks and Regards,Prannoy K VOn Thursday, 27 December 20

Re: Issue with binaries generated(subversion 1.10.2) after compilation on AiX 7.2

2018-12-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 15:04:09 +: > In subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c, in svn_io_file_flush_to_disk(), there's > an APR_STATUS_IS_EINVAL() check. Try making it check > APR_STATUS_IS_EBADF() as well and handle it the same way (assuming "Bad > file number" is strerror(3) of EB

Re: Issue with binaries generated(subversion 1.10.2) after compilation on AiX 7.2

2018-12-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Prannoy K.v wrote on Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:35 +: > Hi Team,  > I tried compiling subversion 1.10.2 on AiX 7.2 machine . Note that 1.10.3 has been released. > After "make" command generated binaries work well in the folder where it > is generated, whereas if we move binaries to a different loca

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > No, you do not need to change your externals. I believe your > understanding is correct, and I think Branko was incorrect. Indeed, in > the absence of an operative revision, the operative revision defaults > to the peg revision (so it do

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> Because the default operative revision is HEAD and there's no such >> object in HEAD, yes. > > > [snip] > >> >> You need both peg and operative revisions: >> >> -r 18 ../fold1 fold

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread David Chapman
On 3/28/2018 9:37 AM, Bo Berglund wrote: Just curious since I am working on setting up our svn repositories migrated from CVS. How does one "lock down" tags to disallow further commits? In CVS that was built-in but svn works differently... Bo B. Put a check for the commit path(s) in the p

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Bo Berglund
Just curious since I am working on setting up our svn repositories migrated from CVS.How does one "lock down" tags to disallow further commits? In CVS that was built-in but svn works differently... Bo B.

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > Our requirements are: at any time in the future, if someone checks > > out code from the past, they should get exactly the same tree as what > > existed in the past. I ass

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Nathan Hartman wrote: > Our requirements are: at any time in the future, if someone checks > out code from the past, they should get exactly the same tree as what > existed in the past. I assume that this is probably THE #1 use case > and desired behavior for ext

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Because the default operative revision is HEAD and there's no such > object in HEAD, yes. [snip] > You need both peg and operative revisions: > > -r 18 ../fold1 fold1@18 > -r 18 ../fold2/file1.txt@18 file1.txt > > The peg revision tells

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:36 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 28.03.2018 01:38, Jonathan Schell wrote: >> I have a tree that looks like: >> >> https://svn/repo/name1/externs/normal_files_here >> >> The folder "externs" has two external properties: >> ../fold1@18 fold1 >> ../fold2/file1.txt@18 file1.tx

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-27 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.03.2018 01:38, Jonathan Schell wrote: > I have a tree that looks like: > > https://svn/repo/name1/externs/normal_files_here > > The folder "externs" has two external properties: > ../fold1@18 fold1 > ../fold2/file1.txt@18 file1.txt > > These folders and file exist at rev 18. The commit to ad

RE: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-27 Thread Jonathan Schell
ay, March 27, 2018 1:49 AM To: Jonathan Schell Cc: Subversion Users ; Ryan Schmidt Subject: Re: issue with relative externals after a rename On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2018, at 17:20, Jonathan Schell wrote: > >> I have a tree where

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2018, at 17:20, Jonathan Schell wrote: > >> I have a tree where one folder is referencing some other folders and >> documents in different parts of the tree. And those externals are pegged. >> >> So, I did a rename of the top f

Re: issue with relative externals after a rename

2018-03-27 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 26, 2018, at 17:20, Jonathan Schell wrote: > I have a tree where one folder is referencing some other folders and > documents in different parts of the tree. And those externals are pegged. > > So, I did a rename of the top folder of the tree. Which of course breaks the > externals. >

Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-02-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > Hi Johan, > > As you suggested I have removed the leading spaces from line 39 > (enable-rep-sharing=false) and this time it worked and was able to > successfully load the problematic revision. > So does this conclude I have the sha-1 c

RE: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-31 Thread Santosh Kondapuram
I have tried doing this before the above work around which worked. Thanks, Santosh. -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 8:59 AM To: Santosh Kondapuram Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue while loading the

Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Santosh Kondapuram > wrote: >> Hi Johan, >> >> Sorry for the delayed response as I was in long vacation. >> Yes, I don’t think we are hitting the real sha-1 collision in our repository >> and as you said i

Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Sorry for the delayed response as I was in long vacation. > Yes, I don’t think we are hitting the real sha-1 collision in our repository > and as you said it might be another bug in the sha-1 collision detection code. > I

RE: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-31 Thread Santosh Kondapuram
ted: efbdb058ce857b2860cfa245f014f0b9 actual: 04a53277f405bcbab8a3b1fff9f8c6e0 Thanks, Santosh. -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:27 PM To: Santosh Kondapuram Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue while loading the S

Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > Hi Johan, > > I have tried reloading the dump as you suggested with -M 0 option but still > I am running in to the same issue. > Seems like the svn admin could not load the dump due to sha1 collision files. > So the question is how d

RE: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-25 Thread Santosh Kondapuram
: Santosh Kondapuram Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7 On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > HI All, > > > > I am running in to issues while loading the SVN dump to one of the > newly created SVN

Re: Issue while loading the SVN Dump SVN version 1.9.7

2018-01-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > HI All, > > > > I am running in to issues while loading the SVN dump to one of the newly > created SVN repository and the error happens only while loading specific > revision 724413. > > Please find the error message below. Appreciate yo

Re: Issue parsing url with '+' in it

2018-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 09:35 +0100: > On 30.12.2017 20:35, John McClean wrote: > > svn export "https://github.com/apache/avro.git/trunk/lang/c++"; > > > > Any ideas? > > Report a bug to GitHub, their Subversion protocol is a custom > implementation that AFAIK is not based on our co

Re: Issue parsing url with '+' in it

2018-01-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 30.12.2017 20:35, John McClean wrote: > I'm trying to checkout/export part of a github repo. > > svn export "https://github.com/apache/avro.git/trunk/lang/c++"; > > This creates a directory but doesn't get any files. It work fine for > urls which don't have a '+' in them. > > URI encoding the '+

Re: Issue with mod_dav_svn while using KrbLocalUserMapping

2017-03-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
William Muriithi wrote on Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 19:02:39 -0500: > After making the necessary changes to work with kerberos, users were > able to authenticate well but I noticed the users ID now had kerberos > REALM. So instead of william, the username changed to > will...@eng.example.com. This was

Re: issue with SVN repository after restoring backup.

2016-11-30 Thread Sandeep
Uuid file is there at the location. Will compare with new repository. Sandeep On Nov 30, 2016 10:24 PM, "Eric Johnson" wrote: > It sounds like the uuid file doesn't exist or is truncated. > > Perhaps make a new test repository, and compare the db/uuid file to the > one in your restored backup?

Re: Issue report

2016-08-12 Thread Andreas Stieger
Regardless:   Compare the commits: https://sourceforge.net/p/tortoisesvn/code/27283   tags the release https://sourceforge.net/p/tortoisesvn/code/27284 commits a build fix to trunk https://sourceforge.net/p/tortoisesvn/code/27285applies the build fix to the tag   As such, never mind, you have the

Re: Issue report

2016-08-12 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi Mike, On 8/10/2016 10:31 PM, Faynberg, Mike wrote: Dear Madam/Sir, I was trying to update the TortoiseSVN on my Win7/32-bit computer. The installer I have is 1.9.4 Build 27285 (see the screenshot below): [..] However upon the installation – and rebooting the computer, the installed s

Re: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository

2015-12-11 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:41:40PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > 0x4015 is basically an "abort". We do this when we need > more memory but can't get it. > > 9000 directory entries is around the capacity of the default > cache configuration (16MB). Make sure, you set the cache to > at least

RE: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository

2015-12-11 Thread Cotrut, Michael
users@subversion.apache.org; Cotrut, Michael Subject: Re: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository > Hi, > > We've been using SVN for a couple of years, recently we migrated from 1.7.6 > to 1.9.2. We also > migrated (dump and load) some of the larger repositories to schema

Re: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository

2015-12-10 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Hi, We've been using SVN for a couple of years, recently we migrated from 1.7.6 to 1.9.2. We also migrated (dump and load) some of the larger repositories to schema 7 and packed them. So, you have not tried the old repository format with 1.9.2? If you should have a copy of that available (bac

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
> > = > I did notice that... (the version being the same for Prerequisites) > > Here is the line from the externals definition > > -r 28594 ^/externals/microsoft/Prerequisites Prerequisites > > It is a directory, that contains the VS 2013 and VS 2008 pre-req distribution >

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > [ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at > the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, > but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] > [ Understood... too many mailing lis

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] [ Understood... too many mailing lists.. ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Here is some more info: > > First I show the

Re: Issue with subversion authentication

2015-04-01 Thread Branko Čibej
On 01.04.2015 08:58, Matthew Durandt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having issues with SVN authenticating my users against my users > file. SVN was working yesterday morning, I then created a new user > account on the SVN server and created a new SVN user using the > htpasswd command. Since then my subversio

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
mixed-revision working copy [28594:29395]; try updating first From: Scott Aron Bloom [mailto:sc...@towel42.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Sv

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Svn up succeeds but does not fix th3 svn merge issue. I'll look at the stack overflow issue since we do have a bunch of

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom &

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Issue in svn E

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
~~Scott Original message From: Johan Corveleyn Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) To: Scott Aron Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 > Its has been common, that after the merge, if another merge is attempted we > get the E195020

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Running svn from tortoise (1.8.11 r1643975) but we have the same issue with > the same version from VisualSVN, as well as the collabnet on linux > > > > Unfortunately, this is going to be a problem to duplicate this since its > only on our

Re: Issue with "database is locked" message after recovering from server failure

2014-12-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Newlyn Erratt wrote on Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 18:19:19 +: > All, > > I had a server failure recently and ended up having to restore from a > hotcopy. Everything went well I did an svnadmin verify with no issues. > I am able to checkout and update with no issues but when I try to > commit I get t

Re: Issue with Subversion client - svn command line interface - Spaces in the message

2014-04-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 17, 2014, at 11:49, Srinivasa Dara wrote: > I am using command line version of svn, version 1.6.11 (r934486) in GNU/Linux Which Linux, specifically? Can you try a newer version of Subversion? 1.6.x and earlier are no longer supported. > When I run any svn command with -m option which

Re: Issue with Subversion client - svn command line interface - Spaces in the message

2014-04-17 Thread Srinivasa Dara
t; svn: Illegal repository URL '' >> >> Example: >> svn mkdir -m "Message with spaces does not work" >> >> Output: >> svn: Illegal repository URL '' >> >> Note: I am using other machine with same OS and svn version, it w

Re: Issue with Subversion client - svn command line interface - Spaces in the message

2014-04-17 Thread Eric Johnson
te: I am using other machine with same OS and svn version, it works with > spaces in the message. > > Appreciate if you have a solution or a fix. > > > > Thanks, > > Srinivasa Dara > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: Thu, Apr

Re: issue validation: bug, Memcached+FullText cache is totally broken in svnserve 1.8.5

2014-02-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:03:47PM +0400, Anatoly Orlov wrote: > Hi. > > Preface: > We are trying to migrate to svn 1.8.5, with very large repository(~700G), > with heavy load(1000+ developers, 200+ test servers) since we use svn+ssh > memcached is reasonable cache system for us. > > Problem: >

Re: Issue with pre-commit hooks in Subversion 1.7.7

2014-01-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 29, 2014, at 22:18, Ramachandran Raghavendran wrote: > I’m using Subversion 1.7.7 on windows with hooks written in python 2.7.2 > > I’m running SVNLOOK commands in my pre-commit hook with the syntax as folow > svnlook log -t commit_txn REPOS_PATH > > I’m able to trap and echo the

Re: Issue - SVN cannot create SASL context

2013-12-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0800, John wrote: > After many hours of apparently pointless googling, I hope to get an answer > here. > > I asked a question on unix.stackexchange.com which essentially outlines my > problem: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/103714/svn-failing-to-crea

Re: Issue 4039

2013-09-05 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Ah yes, that was my intention but I forgot about it :-). It's closed as won't fix now. Thanks for the reminder. -- Johan On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > Johan, > > I think it may be worth to close issue 4039 as "won't fix" in this case. > Since it's extremely low chance th

Re: Issue 4039

2013-09-05 Thread Ivan Zhakov
Johan, I think it may be worth to close issue 4039 as "won't fix" in this case. Since it's extremely low chance that we go back to have .svn per every directory. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Angelo Tavares wrote: > Yes, I have "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", but thanks for the > feed

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-20 Thread Angelo Tavares
Yes, I have "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", but thanks for the feedback. With "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project", works very well indeed 2013/8/19 Johan Corveleyn > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Angelo Tavares > wrote: > > My case is creating subst working areas, which is not presented t

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Angelo Tavares wrote: > My case is creating subst working areas, which is not presented the features > of subversion. > Can you please give a bit more detail? What do you mean by "creating subst working areas"? Do you mean, for instance, that you have a working c

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-19 Thread Angelo Tavares
My case is creating subst working areas, which is not presented the features of subversion. 2013/8/19 Ivan Zhakov > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Johan Corveleyn > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Angelo Tavares > wrote: > >> > >> Good Morning > >> > >> You have a preview relea

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-19 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Angelo Tavares wrote: >> >> Good Morning >> >> You have a preview release of this fix, or if it will be developed? >> >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 > > The issue is: "Add suppo

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-19 Thread Angelo Tavares
Thanks for responding I'll be waiting 2013/8/18 Johan Corveleyn > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Angelo Tavares > wrote: > > > > Good Morning > > > > You have a preview release of this fix, or if it will be developed? > > > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 > > The

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Angelo Tavares wrote: > > Good Morning > > You have a preview release of this fix, or if it will be developed? > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 The issue is: "Add support for windows substed-drives" The last comment in the issue tracke

Re: Issue 4039

2013-08-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On 16 Aug 2013 14:46, "Angelo Tavares" wrote: > > Good Morning > > You have a preview release of this fix, or if it will be developed? > Please save the mailing list readers some time by at least providing the description and preferably also a link to the issue. Thanks -- Johan

Re: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url through client

2013-05-30 Thread Daniel Shahaf
: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:48 AM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Cc: Arvind Sundareswaran > Subject: RE: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url through > client > > Hi Arvind, > > Could you please po

RE: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url through client

2013-05-30 Thread Arvind Sundareswaran
& Regards, Arvind Kumar -Original Message- From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:48 AM To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: Arvind Sundareswaran Subject: RE: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url through client Hi Arvind, Could you

RE: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url through client

2013-05-30 Thread Cooke, Mark
Hi Arvind, Could you please post in plain text instead of HTML? > -Original Message- > From: Arvind Sundareswaran > [mailto:arvind_sundareswa...@horizonblue.com] > Sent: 30 May 2013 13:25 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Issue with respect with Connecting to SVN https url >

Re: Issue: unicode characters in file names

2013-05-13 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Адолин Негаш wrote: > Hello > > I have svn files with unicode chars. When I try to view files, I get an > error message: > > 'https://srv01/svn/SQLServer/Main/BackOffice/Security/Procedures/%5BSecurity%5D.%5BPrivileges::Groups::View(Delphi)%5D.sql' > doesn't exis

Re: Issue

2013-03-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 00:57:49 +0200: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:53:27 -0400: > > That malfunction comes from svn_token__from_word_strict(): > > > > int > > svn_token__from_word_strict(const svn_token_map_t *map, > > const

Re: Issue

2013-03-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:53:27 -0400: > That malfunction comes from svn_token__from_word_strict(): > > int > svn_token__from_word_strict(const svn_token_map_t *map, > const char *word) > { > int value = svn_token__from_word(map, word); > >

Re: Issue

2013-03-14 Thread C. Michael Pilato
That malfunction comes from svn_token__from_word_strict(): int svn_token__from_word_strict(const svn_token_map_t *map, const char *word) { int value = svn_token__from_word(map, word); if (value == SVN_TOKEN_UNKNOWN) SVN_ERR_MALFUNCTION_NO_RETURN(); return va

Re: Issue while setting up subversion repository on Solaris 5.10

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Sapna PB wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:22:00 +0530: > Hi Team, > > Iam facing an issue while setting up subversion repository on Solaris 5.10 > PFB the steps followed. > > > 1. Execute ‘svnadmin create /data/installs/repo’ > > Give 777 permissions to the files and folders in /data/inst

Re: Issue with merge/integration algorithm?

2012-07-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 08:03:22AM -0700, Arunmozhi wrote: > > I am resending the initial mail as the mail format other than text is not > supported. > > I feel that the SVN branching and merging/integration algorithm is > flawed. However I am not sure if this is a known limitation of SVN. I >

Re: Issue with merge/integration algorithm?

2012-07-27 Thread Arunmozhi
final integrated file is shown below. a d b c d z The expected output for the second test as verified in perforce and git is a d b c z Hope now it clarifies the problem. - Original Message ----- From: Stefan Sperling To: Arunmozhi Cc: "users@subversion.apache.org" Sent: Frida

Re: Issue with merge/integration algorithm?

2012-07-27 Thread Arunmozhi
hi Cc: "users@subversion.apache.org" Sent: Friday, 27 July 2012 7:06 PM Subject: Re: Issue with merge/integration algorithm? On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:11:34AM -0700, Arunmozhi wrote: > > > I feel that the SVN branching and merging/integration algorithm is > flawed. Ho

Re: Issue with merge/integration algorithm?

2012-07-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:11:34AM -0700, Arunmozhi wrote: > > > I feel that the SVN branching and merging/integration algorithm is > flawed. However I am not sure if this is a known limitation of SVN. I > did 2 tests to compare SVN against Perforce/git. The intention of the test > is to see i

RE: Issue #2243 still exists with svn 1.6.17

2012-06-30 Thread Bert Huijben
ag 30 juni 2012 15:26 To: Bert Huijben Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue #2243 still exists with svn 1.6.17 This leaves me with a bit of a conundrum. Our IDE would normally automatically call "svn add" when you add a new file to the solution. It is possible that this

Re: Issue #2243 still exists with svn 1.6.17

2012-06-30 Thread Alan McGovern
This leaves me with a bit of a conundrum. Our IDE would normally automatically call "svn add" when you add a new file to the solution. It is possible that this file could be in the svn ignore list. The result is that by attempting to make the developers life easy we will instead always add files

RE: Issue #2243 still exists with svn 1.6.17

2012-06-30 Thread Bert Huijben
The 'no_ignore' flag is only used for recursive targets. Explicitly passed targets (such as via 'svn add *') are always processed. If you would like to use the ignore feature you should call 'svn add --force .', or the api equivalent of that. This adds the directory and everything below tha

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ruhe Julian [mailto:jr...@axway.com] >> Sent: vrijdag 22 juni 2012 14:57 >> To: Stephen Butler >> Cc: Daniel Shahaf; users@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: AW: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not acce

RE: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ruhe Julian [mailto:jr...@axway.com] > Sent: vrijdag 22 juni 2012 14:57 > To: Stephen Butler > Cc: Daniel Shahaf; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: AW: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD > > Hello Daniel, > > >The update command accepts

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Just to be sure, I checked what happens if you don't move the target > of the checkout, but perform some other change below it. Sure enough, > checkout does the right thing: it checks out the correct item, at the > operative revision: Do

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ruhe Julian wrote: >> >>> I'm sort of surprised a checkout works that way either. >> >> I hope this is an argument for expecting svn:externals to do the same. > > No, it is an argument for you to more closely

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ruhe Julian wrote: > >> I'm sort of surprised a checkout works that way either. > > I hope this is an argument for expecting svn:externals to do the same. No, it is an argument for you to more closely align your expectations/usage to what subversion actually does

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ruhe Julian wrote: > Hi Les, > > thank you for your answer. I think I have to explain my use case a little > more detailed. First, we are not talking about source code. Users will not be > software developers. > > Ok, we have defined an area in the repo where "gl

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ruhe Julian wrote: >> >> It sounds like you want Subversion to search for the latest revision in the >> history of URL@REV.  What if that item was deleted and later restored? > > No. Not at all. Forward history of an object is another topic. Not to subversion.

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Stephen Butler wrote: > >> -rHEAD ^/mapping_services/global/testing/full_test/globalresource6.xml@109 >> => gives me an error on svn up if gr.xml6@109 does no longer exist on HEAD >> ^/mapping_services/global/testing/full_test/globalresource6.xml (your >> proposa

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Stephen Butler
use case is not completely remote. I hope I can create an issue > for it. > > Greetings, > Julian > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juni 2012 01:47 > An: Ruhe Julian > Cc: users@subversion.a

RE: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-22 Thread Ruhe Julian
: Ruhe Julian Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Betreff: Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD You're asking svn to trace history forward. (from r109 to rHEAD.) In general there will be N places in rHEAD that are related to gr6.xml@109. Is there a reason to expect that ^/ma

Re: Issue: svn:externals syntax does not accept -rHEAD

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ruhe Julian wrote on Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:17:53 +: > Hello, > > try to assign a file p.txt containing the following lines as svn:external > > -r110 ^/mapping_services/global/testing/full_test/globalresource5.xml@110 > "xml/globalresource5.xml" > -r84 ^/mapping_services/global/testing/full

Re: Issue: Non-constant struct initializers break build on Solaris/SunPRO

2012-06-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:15:16PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > Rewriting the struct declaration/assignment as > > struct foobar fb; > fb.f = foo; > fb.b = bar; > > allows the build to proceed. > > The attached patch does this for the current SVN source and allows >

Re: Issue: Top-level --with-expat option does not accept apr-util's "builtin" argument

2012-06-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:30:16PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > This isn't meant to raise an error at all; the aim is to fool the > top-level script into thinking the user didn't specify --with-expat=* in > this one specific case. Ah, I see. I misunderstood the code you've written. Committed,

Re: Issue: get-deps.sh script is not idempotent

2012-06-20 Thread Daniel Richard G.
On Wed, 2012 Jun 20 08:06-0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Is it worth teaching get-deps.sh to download to a temporary file, and > only put it in place when the download is complete? Or to run a test > "unzip -l" or "tar tf -" on downloads to verify them before > proceeding? Partial, interrupted

Re: Issue: Top-level --with-expat option does not accept apr-util's "builtin" argument

2012-06-20 Thread Daniel Richard G.
Hi Stefan, On Wed, 2012 Jun 20 12:05+0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > +# apr-util accepts "builtin" as an argument to this option > > +test "_$svn_lib_expat" = "_builtin" && svn_lib_expat="::expat" > > Looks like this will make the script error out without an error > message. That might confus

Re: Issue: get-deps.sh script is not idempotent

2012-06-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:39:48PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: >> host:/tmp/subversion$ ./get-deps.sh >> [script output elided] >> >> host:/tmp/subversion$ find . -name apr_hash.c >> ./apr/tables/apr_hash.c >> >> host:/tmp/subversion$ .

Re: Issue: get-deps.sh script is not idempotent

2012-06-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:39:48PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > host:/tmp/subversion$ ./get-deps.sh > [script output elided] > > host:/tmp/subversion$ find . -name apr_hash.c > ./apr/tables/apr_hash.c > > host:/tmp/subversion$ ./get-deps.sh > [script output elided] > > host:/tmp/subversion$

Re: Issue: Top-level --with-expat option does not accept apr-util's "builtin" argument

2012-06-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > Index: configure.ac > === > --- configure.ac (revision 1351789) > +++ configure.ac (working copy) > @@ -373,6 +373,9 @@ > [svn_lib_expat="

Re: Issue with svn log --diff option

2012-03-28 Thread Philip Martin
Yves Martin writes: > $ svn log resources/favicon.ico > > r429 | B | 2010-06-15 14:35:13 +0200 (mar, 15 jun 2010) | 1 line > > r388 | B | 2010-03-05 16

Re: Issue with svn log --diff option

2012-03-28 Thread Yves Martin
Hello, First, Stefan, thanks for your quick answer. You're right, Subversion 1.7.4 "log --diff" works better. But copy operation support is still limited. Here is a quick description of my repository status: $ svn log resources/favicon.ico ---

Re: Issue with svn log --diff option

2012-03-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Yves Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I have used "svn log --diff path/to/myfile.txt" > but the command generates history from the current working directory > instead of limiting the report to the provided path. > > Is it the expected behavior ? If not please

  1   2   >