Ah yes, that was my intention but I forgot about it :-). It's closed as won't fix now. Thanks for the reminder.
-- Johan On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > Johan, > > I think it may be worth to close issue 4039 as "won't fix" in this case. > Since it's extremely low chance that we go back to have .svn per every > directory. > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Angelo Tavares <ang...@mega.com.br>wrote: > >> Yes, I have "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", but thanks for the >> feedback. >> >> With "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project", works very well indeed >> >> >> >> 2013/8/19 Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Angelo Tavares <ang...@mega.com.br> >>> wrote: >>> > My case is creating subst working areas, which is not presented the >>> features >>> > of subversion. >>> > >>> >>> Can you please give a bit more detail? What do you mean by "creating >>> subst working areas"? >>> >>> Do you mean, for instance, that you have a working copy in >>> C:\SomeDir\Project (which is the root of the working copy), and you >>> execute "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project"? If so, that works fine (just >>> tried it with 1.7 and 1.8). >>> >>> But if you want "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", that won't work, >>> and like Ivan said, will probably never be fixed (it really doesn't >>> fit with the working copy design of 1.7+, where all SVN metadata is >>> centralized in the root of the working copy). >>> >>> -- >>> Johan >>> >> >> > > > -- > Ivan Zhakov > CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com >
