RE: File status control

2012-11-28 Thread Ignacio González T .
Hello, Armando. Here we also do IEC / ISO workflows. We use the same svn repository for all kind of artifacts (source code, specs, reports, schematics...). We use tags for everything. For instance, we tag the documents alongside the reports that 'prove' that have been reviewed by who and when. T

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Armando Perico wrote: > This could be a good solution, however, the idea of having the files in > different directories (moving for each status) is not really appreciated > here :S > If you don't at least copy the final/release revs to tags, you are pretty far awa

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Armando Perico
Considering that I won't be able to suggest a DMS (which would be the correct solution as suggested by Andy), what would do is: 1) In order to attach the status of the document and allowing the users to easily see the current status and the previous values, I would probably require a flag i.e.: [

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Armando Perico
Yes, use trac could be an option too. I will definitely check the pros and cons for that! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:51 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch > wrote: > > > > you are probably right if we think only about code and software > projec

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Armando Perico
In some projects we have to use Dimensions, which is a proprietary solution (http://www.serena.com/products/dimensions-cm/index.html) ; However, the standard solution for the projects is SVN and I don't think I will be able to make everybody to learn and use use another program. Well, in any case,

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Armando Perico
This could be a good solution, however, the idea of having the files in different directories (moving for each status) is not really appreciated here :S I really appreciated your answer, it is great to have different point-of-views about this! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt <

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:51 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch wrote: > > you are probably right if we think only about code and software projects; > however, the needs for these features here are to control "documentation > projects" i.e.: to handle documents for ISOs and IECs standard implementat

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ulrich Eckhardt, am Dienstag, 27. November 2012 um 17:10 schrieben Sie: > BTW: If you take a look at TortoiseSVN, it allows diffing of MS Word > files, which could be very beneficial to you as it allows making small > changes like spelling fixes without forcing people to make a full > r

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:51 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch < armando.perico.n...@usi.ch> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > you are probably right if we think only about code and software projects; > however, the needs for these features here are to control "documentation > projects" i.e.: to handle document

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 27.11.2012 16:51, schrieb armando.perico.n...@usi.ch: Note: An important requirement here is that the path of the document shall never change once it has been defined and published internally. Some uses cases: > - Only create a "release" versions of the documentation when all the documents

RE: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread armando.perico.n...@usi.ch
mail.com] Sent: 27 November 2012 15:24 To: Perico Neto Armando Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: File status control On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:44 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch<mailto:armando.perico.n...@usi.ch> mailto:armando.perico.n...@usi.ch>> wrote: Guten Tag Th

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:44 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch < armando.perico.n...@usi.ch> wrote: > Guten Tag Thorsten! > > that's what I've imagined. > > We actually have to use SVN as a sort of configure management system. I am > currently writing a pre-commit hook so we can control it without us

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag armando.perico.n...@usi.ch, am Dienstag, 27. November 2012 um 14:44 schrieben Sie: > Guten Tag Thorsten! Please don't forget to answer to the list instead of me directly as your input surely is interesting to others as well. > It seems weird though that subversion has not a native way

RE: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread armando.perico.n...@usi.ch
ents" love this sort of functionality. Dankeschön From: Thorsten Schöning [tschoen...@am-soft.de] Sent: 27 November 2012 14:05 To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: File status control Guten Tag armando.perico.n...@usi.ch, am Dienstag, 27. November 2012

Re: File status control

2012-11-27 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag armando.perico.n...@usi.ch, am Dienstag, 27. November 2012 um 13:47 schrieben Sie: > I would like to know what is used so far to accomplish this task. Subversion provides versioned properties which could be used but from my experience most projects seem to not think in cases of status f