In some projects we have to use Dimensions, which is a proprietary solution (http://www.serena.com/products/dimensions-cm/index.html) ; However, the standard solution for the projects is SVN and I don't think I will be able to make everybody to learn and use use another program.
Well, in any case, I really appreciate your answer, this really sounds the correct way of doing it. If I would start with a new team//company, "A good DMS" would be my pick! Thanks a lot!! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Andy Levy <andy.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:51 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch < > armando.perico.n...@usi.ch> wrote: > >> Hi Andy, >> >> you are probably right if we think only about code and software projects; >> however, the needs for these features here are to control "documentation >> projects" i.e.: to handle documents for ISOs and IECs standard >> implementation (we pretty much handle .doc files - no need to handle line >> diffs and merges for instance). >> >> Note: An important requirement here is that the path of the document >> shall never change once it has been defined and published internally. >> >> Some uses cases: >> - Only create a "release" versions of the documentation when all the >> documents are with the "approved" status. >> - Only specific author can make revisions >> - A document cannot be "approved" if it has not been "reviewed" and so >> on... >> >> I am not comfortable yetwith the solution we're planning to use in order >> to solve this, however, it seems to be the solution with less "side-effect" >> to the users (once SVN is already used as a repository system for the >> documents). >> >> I am still trying to put the ideas together to come up with a good >> solution. I am open to suggestions... >> >> > I would suggest that you look at something other than SVN, to be perfectly > honest. What you're really looking for is a document management system. In > your original post you said "source code repository", but now you're > talking about managing MS Office files - there's quite a bit of difference > there! > > A good DMS will manage workflow, versioning, status tracking, etc.You can > coerce SVN to do this & build a DMS on top of it, just as people have built > things like this using MS Outlook's Shared Folders, or Lotus Notes as a > base, but there are other tools that are more appropriate & better-tuned to > document management requirements. If you're heavily invested in Microsoft > already, start your search with SharePoint. > -- Armando Perico