On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:44 AM, armando.perico.n...@usi.ch < armando.perico.n...@usi.ch> wrote:
> Guten Tag Thorsten! > > that's what I've imagined. > > We actually have to use SVN as a sort of configure management system. I am > currently writing a pre-commit hook so we can control it without using the > "svn:properties" (we've decided to add a flag on the commit messages with > the current file statuses. It doesn't look much elegant but this was the > only way we've managed to have it "user-friendly"//acceptable for the > developers. > > It seems weird though that subversion has not a native way of doing so, > people from the "quality departments" love this sort of functionality. > > I never consider "file" statuses for the items in my source code repository - only the status of the entire project, via my tags & branches. Releasing individual files to an environment (at least for software my team and I have built) would just lead to large amounts of confusion, and broken releases.
