Re: SVN Path-based Authentication Q...

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag BRM, > am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 16:32 schrieben Sie: > >> [myrepo:*/protectedItem] >> @no_access_group = > >> I looked over the SVN Redbook information and the Apache2 2.2 >> documentation but could not find anything to say t

Re: SVN Path-based Authentication Q...

Guten Tag BRM, am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 16:32 schrieben Sie: > [myrepo:*/protectedItem] > @no_access_group = > I looked over the SVN Redbook information and the Apache2 2.2 > documentation but could not find anything to say that was supported, etc. There was something mentioned on the list,

SVN Path-based Authentication Q...

I am administering a server running Apache Httpd with WebDAV serving a Subversion 1.6.6 repository set on an Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS. A while back I setup path-based authentication using mod_authz_svn in addition to the AuthUserFile directive for logins. This has been working quite well; however

RE: svnsync does not pass username

And that was the winning hint . I unfortunately forgot the authentication rule in the httpd.conf for the svn-proxy-sync location, just had it for the "normal" access of the slave repo. Too stupid, I know. But tata, now it works :) Simply did not know that apache cuts out authentication det

RE: svnsync does not pass username

> -Original Message- > From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de] > Sent: dinsdag 3 juli 2012 14:04 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svnsync does not pass username > > Guten Tag Warden, Neil, > am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 12:49 schrieben Sie: > > > Content o

Re: svnsync does not pass username

Guten Tag Warden, Neil, am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 12:49 schrieben Sie: > Content of the logfile: > "Arguments: > "E:\Programs\svn_repository\vpl_slave\hooks\pre-revprop-change.bat" > E:\Programs\svn_repository\vpl_slave 0 "" svn:sync-lock A" > "Repo: E:\Programs\svn_repository\vpl_slave Rev: 0

Re: svn/fs.py and buffering

ha...@hjackson.org writes: > 117c117 > < p = _subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=_subprocess.PIPE, > --- >> > p = _subprocess.Popen(cmd, bufsize=-1, stdout=_subprocess.PIPE, > I've committed this as r1356668. Thanks! -- Philip

Re: svnsync does not pass username

Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning, am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 10:40 schrieben Sie: > Provide a complete command line, there surely is an error in it. Have a look at the following example: svnsync sync "somePath" --source-username xy --source-password z --sync-username ab --sync-password z --non-int

Re: RE: svnsync does not pass username

Hi Neil, do you have special characters in the password things like "~%!" ? Might be a problem on Windows ? may be you need to escape some characters... Is the authentication done via LDAP or Active Directory ? Have you given the correct user names incl. the prefix for ldap or AD ? And it woul

Re: svnsync does not pass username

Guten Tag Warden, Neil, am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 um 09:59 schrieben Sie: > I have tried all combinations, --username, --sync-username and > --source-username :( Provide a complete command line, there surely is an error in it. > Could it be some version mismatch, because master and slave run >

RE: svnsync does not pass username

Hi Karl-Heinz :) I have tried all combinations, --username, --sync-username and --source-username :( On the slave side the hook currently writes the passed arguments into a logfile, there I can see that no username is given, in all cases it is an empty string (even when I do not pass any option

Re: bug in "Undoing Changes" functionality of merge -c -N?

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Nairn Baliber wrote: > Hi Phillip. > > Thanks for the response. > > I am unclear about the intended functionality of SVN when using merge -c -M > (or -r M:), given your response and the instructions in the svn book. > If I display the conflict brought up by the afor

Re: svnsync does not pass username

Hi Neil, have you given the --sync-username and --sync-password instead ? Cause --username and --password are used for authentication against the local repository and not for authentication against the remote repository ? Kind regards Karl-heinz Marbaise Original-Nachricht > D