- Am 19. Okt 2018 um 2:17 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org:
> On 18/10/2018 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote:
>>> Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
>>
>> I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost.
>>
>
On 18/10/2018 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote:
>> Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
>
> I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost.
>
Does this mean https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2514 is finished and can be
cl
On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote:
Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax
Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
Thanks,
Alan
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 15/10/2018 14:23, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot Sebastian for referring me to the git master.
> >
> > Actua
On 15/10/2018 14:23, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
Thanks a lot Sebastian for referring me to the git master.
Actually, I cloned the current git master and I was looking for the
RTEMS kernel (source code) and I have found it in this path:
"rtems-master/cpukit/rtems"
I think this is the RTEMS library
On 12/10/2018 11:57, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
On 2018-10-12 07:49, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/10/2018 17:32, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
Thanks a lot Sebastian for your answer.
Actually, we are planning to run a multi-core system using a
network-on-chip and network interfaces as a physical interconnec
On 11/10/2018 17:32, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
Thanks a lot Sebastian for your answer.
Actually, we are planning to run a multi-core system using a
network-on-chip and network interfaces as a physical interconnect
between cores instead of the bus interconnect. I understood that MPCI
by the OS mayb
Hello Thawra,
On 11/10/2018 12:40, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
Hello,
please, I have a question about using RTEMS in AMP mode.
In AMP mode we can boot RTEMS from one core and then it starts other
cores with their own instances of RTEMS.
The question is does the master RTEMS support running
Hello,
please, I have a question about using RTEMS in AMP mode.
In AMP mode we can boot RTEMS from one core and then it starts other
cores with their own instances of RTEMS.
The question is does the master RTEMS support running another version of
RTEMS in other cores?
For example, in case
