Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward? Thanks, Alan
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 15/10/2018 14:23, Thawra Kadeed wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot Sebastian for referring me to the git master. > > > > Actually, I cloned the current git master and I was looking for the > > RTEMS kernel (source code) and I have found it in this path: > > > > "rtems-master/cpukit/rtems" > > > > I think this is the RTEMS library which constitutes the RTEMS kernel > > in general irrespective to other features and modules attached to it. > > Is that right? > > This directory contains the Classic API implementation which I would not > use in new applications. The core operating system parts are in > cpukit/score. > > > > > On the other hand, RTEMS supports dynamic memory allocation (DMA) and > > priority inheritance. However and as I understood from you, if we > > choose priority-based scheduling (which is another scheduling policy) > > and static memory allocation by the App, then the executable file will > > automatically have only these features without by example the DMA, so > > I think it is all the App dependent, right? > > RTEMS uses currently dynamic memory (the so called workspace) internally > for some things. This was also the case 20 years ago. Maybe we can get > rid of using dynamic memory in some time. By default, it is only used by > the operating system during system initialization. > > Only the services used by the application and the operating system are > included in the executable. For example, if you don't use the FAT file > system, then the stuff for the FAT file system is not in your executable > even though the FAT file system support is in the librtemscpu.a which > you used to link your executable. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users