----- Am 19. Okt 2018 um 2:17 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > On 18/10/2018 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote: >>> Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward? >> >> I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost. >> > > Does this mean https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2514 is finished and can be > closed?
No, but there is not much left to do. There is a pending patch set here: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-October/023316.html _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
