[Bug 199105] Re: Please update x11vnc to new version

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118824 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118824 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 118824 x11vnc version bump -- fixes krdc bug -- Please update x11vnc to new version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199105 You received this bug notification

[Bug 184682] Re: kscreensaver immediately reengages when attempting to connect to the system with VNC

I found a couple of upstream bug reports: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134765 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142308 ** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #134765 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134765 ** Also affects: kdebase via http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug 184682] Re: kscreensaver immediately reengages when attempting to connect to the system with VNC

This is a known problem in kdesktop_lock (in the kdesktop package). A workaround is to pass the '-nodpms' parameter to x11vnc. See http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/#faq-kde-screensaver for more details. Do you still experience this problem in Hardy? ** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagen

[Bug 196675] Re: vino only listens for ipv6 connections

I am unable to connect via IPv4 (Hardy). -- vino only listens for ipv6 connections https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 196675] Re: vino only listens for ipv6 connections

Possible upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403183 -- vino only listens for ipv6 connections https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 172247] Re: fullscreen controls flicker on and off

If this bug is a duplicate, what bug is it a duplicate of? I'm having this same problem but couldn't find any other bug reports. -- fullscreen controls flicker on and off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is t

[Bug 164716] Re: linux-virtual kernel images need LSI scsi driver for VMware ESX

Can this be backported to Gutsy? Also, this seems like a duplicate of bug #163227 (which was marked as invalid for some bizarre reason). -- linux-virtual kernel images need LSI scsi driver for VMware ESX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164716 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 163227] Re: ubuntu jeos 7.10 - can't boot using vmware server

It looks like this will be fixed in Hardy -- see bug #164716 -- ubuntu jeos 7.10 - can't boot using vmware server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 172247] Re: fullscreen controls flicker on and off

Reopening since this does not appear to be a duplicate. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- fullscreen controls flicker on and off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contac

[Bug 158245] Re: multiseat gdm won't switch users

I too have this problem, although I'd say it's a bug in fast-user- switch-applet, not gdm. I believe the upstream bug is at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368704 ** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: gdm => fast-user-switch-applet Status: New => Conf

[Bug 189844] Re: [Hardy-Alpha 4 PPC] Screen resolution correct but shifted to the right

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #14659 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14659 ** Also affects: xorg-server via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14659 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [Hardy-Alpha 4 PPC] Screen resolution correct but shif

[Bug 158245] Re: multiseat gdm won't switch users

I'm sorry, I misread your bug report. The bug in fast-user-switch- applet is related, but not the same as the bug you reported. I do have the same problem as you, however. As far as I understand it, your bug is partially due to a limitation in gnome-screensaver, partially due to a limitation in

[Bug 158245] Re: multiseat gdm won't switch users

** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet Status: New => Invalid -- multiseat gdm won't switch users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 109725] Re: can't set hardware address in /etc/network/interfaces

I am having a similar problem in Gutsy. After adding the line "hwaddress ether 01:23:45:67:89:ab" to /etc/network/interfaces and running "sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart", I get the error message "SIOCSIFHWADDR: Device or resource busy". Commenting out the hwaddress line and adding a pre-up r

[Bug 186368] Re: install errors with 7.10

Possibly related bugs: bug #158901, bug #175971, bug #181424 -- install errors with 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186368 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 181424] Re: [hardy]scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:1315: parser error : Premature end of data in tag tocsect2

I think the scrollkeeper errors may be from a different problem than the I/O errors. See bug #158901, bug #175971, bug #186368, and http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=3693349 -- [hardy]scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:1315: parser error : Premature end of data in tag tocsect2 https://bugs.lau

[Bug 158901] Re: Errors from scrollkeeper during updates from gutsy-{security, updates}

Possibly related bugs: bug #175971, bug #181424, bug #186368 -- Errors from scrollkeeper during updates from gutsy-{security,updates} https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 175971] Re: scrollkeeper: Parser errors during apt-get update or dpkg configure -a

Possibly related bugs: bug #158901, bug #181424, bug #186368 -- scrollkeeper: Parser errors during apt-get update or dpkg configure -a https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubun

[Bug 186368] Re: install errors with 7.10

I have also seen this when installing various packages (not cdbs). A workaround is available at: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=3693349 -- install errors with 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186368 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 198639] Re: Prevu fails to build compiz

I'm not the author of prevu, but I believe this is a feature, not a bug. If prevu automatically backported build dependencies, you might end up replacing several critical core packages and break your system. Prevu requires a user to manually backport any required build dependencies, and this has t

[Bug 179660] Re: New versions of packages are not backported

I too am frequently frustrated with the lack of bleeding-edge versions in the most current release of Ubuntu. However, there are good reasons for not constantly upgrading packages for a particular distribution. For one, the effort required to closely track upstream, provide packages for all releas

[Bug 206335] [NEW] Feature request: Automatically tweak dependency specifications when backporting

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: prevu This is a feature request to address dependency problems such as the ones reported in bug #177620 and at : Prevu should automatically edit debian/control and update dependency specificat

[Bug 153425] Re: (Multiseat) screen shifts when /dev/console written to

vandebo: Do you have multiple video cards configured? Are you running Gutsy? Running 'echo -n "a" > /dev/console' many times doesn't trigger the problem for me. -- (Multiseat) screen shifts when /dev/console written to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153425 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 153425] Re: (Multiseat) screen shifts when /dev/console written to

> I'm on dapper, but the root problem seems the same. Sort of. The 2.6.22 release of the Linux kernel contains a fix that eliminated most of the shifting that happened in 2.6.21 and earlier. With 2.6.22, it is no longer possible to get the screen to shift by typing "echo -n a > /dev/console" many

[Bug 189844] Re: [Hardy-Alpha 4 PPC] Screen resolution correct but shifted to the right

Bummer, so it's not the same bug I've been hunting, which means that I have no way to reproduce this. My guess is that this is a bug in the nv driver -- have you searched the upstream bugzilla (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/)? If there isn't a report already there, you may want to consider reportin

[Bug 189844] Re: [Hardy-Alpha 4 PPC] Screen resolution correct but shifted to the right

That's great news! > At least it shows that it is the NV driver for sure Exactly, which is a big step in getting this bug resolved. Because you were able to narrow down the bug to the driver, I'm marking the bug as confirmed and setting the affected package to xserver-xorg-video-nv (which anyone

[Bug 189844] Re: [Hardy-Alpha 4 PPC] Screen resolution correct but shifted to the right

> Is there any benefit or problem by just using one tiny file from Feisty > to fix this rather than swapping out the entire xserver package? One benefit is that it is simple and easy to do. Possible problems: 1. The older driver version might contain ugly bugs that aren't present in the newe

[Bug 438454] Re: NetworkManager fails to set IP and route information entered

reverting invalid bug changes ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Kernel Bugs (kernel-bugs) => (unassigned) -- NetworkManager fails to set IP and route information entered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438454 You received th

[Bug 438454] Re: NetworkManager fails to set IP and route information entered

reverting invalid bug changes ** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU (motu) => (unassigned) -- NetworkManager fails to set IP and route information entered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438454 You received this b

[Bug 311328] Re: Add pulseaudio output support

I've been running mythfrontend (0.22 from the mythbuntu trunk-0.22 ppa) with EXPERIMENTALLY_ALLOW_PULSE_AUDIO=1 for a while now and it's been working quite well. The command for my gnome panel launcher is: env EXPERIMENTALLY_ALLOW_PULSE_AUDIO=1 mythfrontend --service -- Add pulseaudio output sup

[Bug 438520] Re: Right Alt key is always selected under "key to choose 3rd level"

I am also having this problem. Could this be a regression of bug #76901? I have a standard US 104-key keybard, yet my /etc/default /console-setup also has XKBOPTIONS="lv3:ralt_switch". -- Right Alt key is always selected under "key to choose 3rd level" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438520 You

[Bug 299330] Re: Alt+Tab - switching applications delay. slow

Given the number of people that this is affecting, I'm changing the status to confirmed. (This issue also affects me.) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- Alt+Tab - switching applications delay. slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299330 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 344522] Re: konsole in KDE 4.2 (Intrepid) do not respect size settings

Thanks for the workaround Andreas. Unfortunately, that workaround only works if you are using the KWin window manager (the window manager that comes with KDE). If you're using Gnome and the Compiz window manager, a similar but inferior workaround is to enable window rules: 1. Install compizcon

[Bug 76901] Re: right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts)

Yes, I've noticed this problem in Karmic. I believe it's a regression, so filing a new bug report may be a good idea. Also see bug #438520. -- right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76901 You

[Bug 433625] [NEW] should add Breaks to debian/control

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart The latest upstart package breaks some older packages, such as initscripts (<= 2.87dsf-4ubuntu2). These should be added to a Breaks line in debian/control to ensure safe upgrades and to make it easier to backport upstart to Jaunty. ** Affects: u

[Bug 433723] [NEW] document USPLASH option in initramfs.conf

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools The new upstart-related changes to usplash and initramfs-tools prevents the startup splash screen from showing unless the user adds "USPLASH=y" to /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf. This should be documented somewhere. ** Affects: init

[Bug 433773] [NEW] USPLASH=y option in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d/cryptsetup is ignored

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools initramfs-tools version 0.92bubuntu46 (Karmic) The cryptsetup password prompt is always text based even though USPLASH=y has been added to /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf- hooks.d/cryptsetup (in cryptsetup version 2:1.0.6+20090405.svn49-1

[Bug 393656] Re: postfix fails on boot with "fatal: could not find any active network interfaces"

lo is configured, but I'm not sure when that interface is brought up. -- postfix fails on boot with "fatal: could not find any active network interfaces" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 432315] Re: [ASUSTeK Computer INC. 1005HA] late resume failure

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 430654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430654 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 432809 Warnings about NAME="%k" from 40-ppc.rules ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 430654 udev 147 outputs warnings about default rules -- [ASU

[Bug 432809] Re: Warnings about NAME="%k" from 40-ppc.rules

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 430654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430654 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 430654 udev 147 outputs warnings about default rules -- Warnings about NAME="%k" from 40-ppc.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432809 You received this b

[Bug 432804] Re: Karmic A-6 Errors on boot

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 430654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430654 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 432809 Warnings about NAME="%k" from 40-ppc.rules ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 430654 udev 147 outputs warnings about default rules -- Karm

[Bug 392039] Re: initramfs scripts hard-coded to load i915; blocks loading non-intel drm modules

Somewhat off topic, but isn't uvesafb preferred over vesafb? -- initramfs scripts hard-coded to load i915; blocks loading non-intel drm modules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 467052] Re: flashplugin-nonfree 64bits should use .deb 64bits

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 326555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #326555, so it is being marked as such. Please look a

[Bug 451805] Re: flashplugin-installer installs i386 and amd64 versions of Flash plugin and confuses Firefox

>From what I understand, the 64-bit version of the plugin is not packaged at all, and the i386 binary is used for both i386 and amd64 platforms. See bug #326555. Perhaps flashplugin-installer is conflicting with a manually-installed libflashplayer.so on your system. Check to see if libflashplayer

[Bug 414185] Re: flashplugin-nonfree uses OSS instead of ALSA (configured for pulseaudio), blocks all other sound apps

Is this a duplicate of bug #412711? ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- flashplugin-nonfree uses OSS instead of ALSA (configured for pulseaudio), blocks all other sound apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414185 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 380050] Re: flash plugin + pulse crashe

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363686 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363686 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #363686, so it is being marked as such. Please look a

[Bug 228887] Re: please give closure to headphone - master volume bug

Reverting changes by an apparently buggy kernel janitor bot (triaged->incomplete->expired all in one day?). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Tags removed: kj-expired -- please give closure to headphone - master volume bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22888

[Bug 417449] Re: missing field for lpia line in debian.master/d-i/kernel-versions.in

Problem still present. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- missing field for lpia line in debian.master/d-i/kernel-versions.in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 295347] Re: missing /boot/config-2.6.27-7-server

This is still a problem in Intrepid, but it does not appear to be a problem in Jaunty or Karmic. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- missing /boot/config-2.6.27-7-server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295347 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 417470] Re: debian/control incomplete if debian/debian.env has not yet been generated

Still present (using Git tag Ubuntu-2.6.31-20.57). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- debian/control incomplete if debian/debian.env has not yet been generated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417470 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 378118] Re: /usr/share/dokuwiki/.htaccess should not be overwritten on upgrade (should be considered a config file)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #506100 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506100 ** Also affects: dokuwiki (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506100 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- /usr/share/dokuwiki/.htaccess should not be

[Bug 513494] [NEW] Cross Site Request Forgery.

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: dokuwiki DokuWiki upstream has fixed a vulnerability present in the dokuwiki-0.0.20090214b-2 package: http://bugs.splitbrain.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1853 http://www.splitbrain.org/blog/2010-

[Bug 513493] [NEW] Information Leakage and Privilege Escalation.

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: dokuwiki DokuWiki upstream has fixed a vulnerability present in the dokuwiki-0.0.20090214b-2 package: http://bugs.splitbrain.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1847 The vulnerability was fixed in vers

[Bug 513494] Re: Cross Site Request Forgery.

Note that Debian upstream has already packaged and published a fixed version, and this version has already been synced and published in lucid. Attaching the debdiff from 0.0.20090214b-2 (karmic) to 0.0.20090214b-3.1 (lucid). ** Patch added: "debdiff from 0.0.20090214b-2 to 0.0.20090214b-3.1" h

[Bug 513494] Re: Cross Site Request Forgery.

According to , the vulnerability was introduced in version 2008-05-05 so I'm nominating Intrepid, Jaunty, and Karmic (the releases with a vulnerable version). -- Cross Site Request Forgery. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513494 You re

[Bug 513493] Re: Information Leakage and Privilege Escalation.

According to , the vulnerability was introduced in version 2008-05-05 so I'm nominating Intrepid, Jaunty, and Karmic (the releases with a vulnerable version). -- Information Leakage and Privilege Escalation. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 513493] Re: Information Leakage and Privilege Escalation.

Note that Debian upstream has already packaged and published a fixed version, and this version has already been synced and published in lucid. Attaching the debdiff from 0.0.20090214b-2 (karmic) to 0.0.20090214b-3.1 (lucid). ** Patch added: "debdiff from 0.0.20090214b-2 to 0.0.20090214b-3.1" h

[Bug 437871] Re: need settle before modprobe $FB for uvesafb

It's possibly a bug, but not this one -- I'd recommend filing a new bug report. In the meantime, I think you can work around it by doing "video=uvesafb:mode_option=1400x1050". -- need settle before modprobe $FB for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437871 You received this bug notification

[Bug 281296] Re: Usplash hangs [ 2.060544] uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22

** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Usplash hangs [2.060544] uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 437871] Re: need settle before modprobe $FB for uvesafb

Looks like I already filed bug #366343 about the mode_option issue a while back. -- need settle before modprobe $FB for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 366343] Re: in initramfs-tools scripts/init-top/framebuffer: "mode" parameter should be "mode_option"

Apologies -- the mode_option parameter only applies to framebuffer drivers that use modedb (which includes uvesafb). As a workaround for drivers that use modedb, you can specify the video parameter like this: video=uvesafb:mode_option=1400x1050 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ini

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck is ignored

The last field is 1. From my /etc/fstab: # / was on /dev/mapper/grok-root during installation UUID=1f5e4adc-cd7b-4b38-8952-58dc160368c0 / ext4 relatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1 -- /forcefsck is ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435707 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't check root filesystem when passno=0

I'm going to reopen this because I don't think you saw comment #7 (passno=1 in my /etc/fstab). ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => New -- /forcefsck doesn't check root filesystem when passno=0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435707 You received this bug notification

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't check root filesystem when passno=0

I think the issue I'm seeing is that /forcefsck doesn't cause the '-f' argument to be added to fsck for ext{2,3,4} (unlike Jaunty). ** Summary changed: - /forcefsck doesn't check root filesystem when passno=0 + /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck.ext4 -- /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' arg

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck.ext4, fsck.ext3, fsck.ext2

** Summary changed: - /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck.ext4 + /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck.ext4, fsck.ext3, fsck.ext2 ** Summary changed: - /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck.ext4, fsck.ext3, fsck.ext2 + /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

Upgrading to mountall-0.2.0~boot3 left my system unbootable. I booted into another installation, chrooted into the broken install, and downgraded mountall to 0.1.8. Unfortunately, it's still unbootable. Usplash comes up, I enter my cryptsetup password, and after a while of inactivity the usplash

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

** Attachment added: "output of 'sudo mountall --force-fsck --debug' with mountall-0.2.0~boot3 (before rebooting)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7246/mountall-post-upgrade-to-ppa-pre-reboot.log -- /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2) https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

I'm attaching two mountall log files, one from running 'sudo mountall --force-fsck --debug 2>&1' before upgrading to mountall-0.2.0~boot3 and one after upgrading. mountall-0.1.8 never returned (I had to end it with ctrl-c) and the output is truncated, probably because stdout wasn't flushed when I

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

I think it was trying to get me to manually run fsck but it never dropped me to a shell (as far as I could tell). When I took out 'quiet splash' from my kernel command-line arguments it told me to manually run fsck and it dropped me to a shell. I manually ran fsck and fixed some "Superblock modif

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

I tried upgrading to mountall-0.2.0~boot3 again and the same thing happened -- I couldn't boot. The boot process just stopped at the point where the filesystems would be checked and mounted. It didn't ask to manually run fsck, so I'm not sure what's wrong. I modified the script section of /etc/i

[Bug 393656] Re: postfix fails on boot with "fatal: could not find any active network interfaces"

Yes, although I haven't tried it in karmic yet. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- postfix fails on boot with "fatal: could not find any active network interfaces" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393656 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 447049] Re: face browser should respond to as well as a mouse click

I used to be able to hit enter to select a user, but now I have to click with the mouse. There's apparently no way to log in if you don't have a mouse. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- face browser should respond to as well as a mouse click https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 447206] Re: In Karmic there is no easy way to disable the drums on gdm startup

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 445747 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445747 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #437429, so it is being marked as such. Please look a

[Bug 447206] Re: In Karmic there is no easy way to disable the drums on gdm startup

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 445747 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445747 Apologies, I marked this as a duplicate of the wrong bug. Bug #437429 appears to be about the sound that plays after login, while this bug report is about the sound that plays before login. I'm marking this

[Bug 420355] Re: cryptsetup stops after opening encrypted device

I'm experiencing an issue with similar symptoms (enter password at boot, the drive unlocks but then nothing happens). I think my problem might be caused by changes to initramfs-tools that occurred after you reported your bug, however. Just so I can be sure that my problem is different than your p

[Bug 433193] Re: ALF2009 Karmic Test: Auto-Resume Test: Did not resume. Latitude D610 (sn 65LG871), 2GB, Intel Wifi (not factory wifi).

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- ALF2009 Karmic Test: Auto-Resume Test: Did not resume. Latitude D610 (sn 65LG871), 2GB, Intel Wifi (not factory wifi). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck is ignored

I modified /etc/init/mountall.conf as follows: $ diff -u mountall.conf.old mountall.conf --- mountall.conf.old 2009-09-25 05:40:33.331304981 -0400 +++ mountall.conf 2009-09-25 05:39:48.551305237 -0400 @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ console output script +mount -t tmpfs none /tmp +exec > /tm

[Bug 437871] [NEW] (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools initramfs-tools version 0.92bubuntu50 removed mknods for /dev/mem and /dev/zero, but they are not created by the time the framebuffer script runs. uvesafb (actually v86d) requires these devices (see bug #285970). To verify, I modified /u

[Bug 437871] Re: (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero

I added back the mknod lines and uvesafb started working again. -- (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 437871] Re: (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero

Correct -- /dev/mem and /dev/zero are not there by the time modprobe is invoked. Is it possible that this is a race condition? I noticed "udevadm settle" is run at the end of the script -- think it might help to also run "udevadm settle" before running modprobe? -- (regression) uvesafb needs mi

[Bug 437871] Re: (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero

I tried adding "udevadm settle" before modprobe and that fixed it. -- (regression) uvesafb needs missing /dev/mem, /dev/zero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck is ignored

I should also note that after running "sudo touch /forcefsck" and rebooting, "/forcefsck" is still there after I log in. I figured it would be deleted after fsck is run. I'm attaching two files: one from when /forcefsck did not exist and one from when /forcefsck was present. ** Attachment added

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck is ignored

** Attachment added: "mountall-with-forcefsck.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32767225/mountall-with-forcefsck.log ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- /forcefsck is ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435707 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 446596] Re: fsck does not show progress during boot

In addition to showing fsck progress, Jaunty allows the user to cancel the fsck. It would be nice if Karmic allowed the same. -- fsck does not show progress during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446596 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

The status of this bug was automatically set to 'fix released' when mountall-0.2.0 was released even though the change mentioned in the changelog didn't actually apply to this bug. I'm reopening this bug. ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- /forcefsck doesn't

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

I was able to boot with 0.2.0~boot4, so I was able to capture new logs (one without /forcefsck and one with). I'm attaching them. ** Attachment added: "boot log of mountall-0.2.0~boot4 without /forcefsck present" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33456094/mountall-0.2.0%7Eboot4_no_forcefsck.log

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

** Attachment added: "boot log of mountall-0.2.0~boot4 with /forcefsck present" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33456100/mountall-0.2.0%7Eboot4_with_forcefsck.log -- /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435707 You received this bug

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

Looking at the logs, I'm now convinced the '-f' argument is added to fsck. It looks like the real issue is that the user isn't notified that an fsck is happening and the user isn't given the option to cancel the fsck (regression from Jaunty). I'll mark this bug as invalid and open a new bug (if o

[Bug 435707] Re: /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2)

See bug #446596. -- /forcefsck doesn't add '-f' argument to fsck (for ext4, ext3, ext2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 448891] [NEW] /forcefsck file never deleted

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall The /forcefsck file is never removed by mountall, so if /forcefsck exists the filesystems will be checked at every boot until that file is manually removed. I expect the /forcefsck file to be removed after fsck/mounting completes (as in Jaunty).

[Bug 445747] Re: Login screen ready sound plays while sound scheme is turned off

changing status back to new since the questions were answered ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Login screen ready sound plays while sound scheme is turned off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 439604] Re: boot process isn't paused while fsck runs on partition: boot process is completed with fsck running in the background preventing partition from mounting

On upgrades will "bootwait" be automatically added to the applicable lines in /etc/fstab? If not, would you be opposed to adding that feature? -- boot process isn't paused while fsck runs on partition: boot process is completed with fsck running in the background preventing partition from mount

[Bug 435707] [NEW] [karmic] /forcefsck is ignored

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall In Jaunty, putting a file named 'forcefsck' in the root directory triggered a filesystem check the next time the computer booted. Now /forcefsck appears to be ignored. ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Ne

[Bug 432228] [NEW] upstart 0.6.3-3 needs Provides: upstart-logd

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart Newer versions of upstart no longer create an upstart-logd binary package, but ubuntu-minimal-1.140 (from Jaunty) depends on upstart-logd. upstart-logd should be added to Replaces/Conflicts/Provides (in accordance to

[Bug 432234] [NEW] upstart-compat-sysv should be a transitional package

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart apparmor-2.3+1289-0ubuntu14 (from Jaunty) depends on upstart-compat-sysv (>= 0.3.9-6). The new upstart 0.6 packages Provide upstart-compat-sysv, but sadly virtual packages can't satisfy versioned dependencies (see

[Bug 432234] Re: upstart-compat-sysv should be a transitional package

** Description changed: Binary package hint: upstart apparmor-2.3+1289-0ubuntu14 (from Jaunty) depends on upstart-compat-sysv (>= 0.3.9-6). The new upstart 0.6 packages Provide upstart-compat-sysv, but sadly virtual packages can't satisfy versioned dependencies (see

[Bug 497941] [NEW] FTBFS: In function 'Xerror': cleanup.c:288: error: 'X_ShmAttach' undeclared

Public bug reported: x11vnc-0.9.8-2 (lucid) fails to build from source: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36591628/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid- amd64.x11vnc_0.9.8-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -Wall -c -o x11vnc-cleanup.o `test -f 'cleanup.c' || echo

[Bug 353483] Re: konsole reports wrong window size (lines=24) to terminal programs

According to the upstream bug report, it only happens if new tabs/windows start at 80x40 and it only affects programs that use the alternate screen buffer (vim, less, screen, etc.). If the new tab/window starts at 80x39, 80x41, 81x40, etc., then it's not a problem. That matches my experience. --

[Bug 353483] Re: konsole + tcsh + vim has wrong window size

This bug appears to have worsened in Karmic -- I see it almost every time I open a new konsole window or open a new tab inside an existing konsole window. ** Summary changed: - konsole + tcsh + vim has wrong window size + konsole reports wrong window size (columns, rows) to terminal programs --

[Bug 353483] Re: konsole reports wrong window size (columns, rows) to terminal programs

** Also affects: kdebase Importance: Undecided Status: New -- konsole reports wrong window size (columns, rows) to terminal programs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubun

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >