Changing status to Fix committed as it's fixed upstream.
Please feel free to reopen if there is any problem concerning that bug.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError even when the "test" works in remote backup site
https://bugs.la
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 104294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 104294
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeError in
on_main_radio_group_changed()
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeErr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 104294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
Hi, thank you for your report.
You can use the file provide in here :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/67814
Take the last beta (12)
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with Att
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: e2fsprogs
e2fsck should have a progress bar for each operation it's doing .
I have a 150GB hard drive formatted in ext3 . That disk is checked after 26
mount . But I always think my computer is hanging when the check is being done
(it takes at least 15
Setting as confirmed as it's true . But I think it's not especially a
gedit lack it seems to be more a Gnome one . Try using the printing
option in all gnome application (using the gnome printing widget ) and
you'll get the same problem.
** Changed in: gnome-print (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gedit
I forgot to join the sources
** Attachment removed: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7381072/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7393419/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use
regarding the profiling see that page :
http://docs.python.org/lib/profile.html
Since Aigars is not actually free for working on this, I don't know if he can
take care of that.
Basically I think that kind of problem could be avoid if we could retreive the
flist and fprops information from the b
Hi,
Actually the TAR tool has a built in backup (with incremental support) system.
It creates a file just looking like a mixed of the flist and fprops file. Look
at some documentation here :
http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/tar.html#Backups.
The format of both file are quite the same.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Committed
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96807 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96807
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.lau
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96807 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96807
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.lau
The package proposed in Bug #106153 fix that bug
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Committed
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Just for information : sbackup 0.10.4 is only on Gutsy for now.
changelog here :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/sbackup/0.10.4
--
sbackup denies group access to /var/backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
did you try the new version 0.10.4 ?
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=145360&package_id=159869&release_id=512980
This bug should be fixed . I think there is dupplicates of it out there that I
fixed .
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with KeyError in btree_r_add()
https://bugs.la
I propose this patch .
To use after over the one here :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/106153/comments/4
to be fully compliant.
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.diff"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7352454/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.diff
--
[Feisty] Sbackup doesn't sa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 104294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 104294
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeError in
on_main_radio_group_changed()
--
sbackup does not save config file
https://bugs.launchpa
In fact I didn't meant it to be install by users, it was for the
developper to apply on the source file and to release it like an update.
But since he is not responding, I'll try to package it myself and put it
here so that you can use it will waiting for an official fix.
--
[Whislist] Let Sback
Here is the binary package, just install it and report here if the bug
still persists.
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2_all.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7354844/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2_all.deb
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
Yo
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7354847/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bu
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.dsc"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7354849/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.dsc
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug cont
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sbackup
Use case :
Actually, if I have a problem and I need to reinstall my system, If I want to
revert to the last state, I need to see each snapshot to get the latest file I
want and to complete with the full snapshot.
I would like sbackup to be abl
** Attachment removed: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2_all.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7354844/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2_all.deb
** Attachment removed: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7354847/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz
** Attachment removed: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.dsc"
ht
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7381072/sbackup_0.10.3-0.2.tar.gz
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bu
please uninstall the first deb I've put in here if you already installed
it .
The last one has 2 bugs :
* you needed to click twice on the recommended setting radio button to select
it.
* It doesn't do the backup cause of a missing library (launch "sudo sbackupd"
to see if you get an error messa
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:20:53 +0200
Source: sbackup
Binary: sbackup
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.3-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Aigars Mahinovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Aziz Ouattara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
sbackup- Simple Backup
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: alexandria
When I search for a book in alexandria with Amazon provider, even after
configuring it with the fr locale. There is no result found
To reproduce, try using : 2743604204 as an ISBN and try on Amazon.fr, you can
find the book.
Try on alexandr
You're right :-p . That's due to my packaging incompetence.
To see the problem :
~$ dpkg -L sbackup
~$ which simple-backup-config
~$ file `which simple-backup-config`
And here you see a very weird link :-p
Here is a fix (just reinstall it )
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.3-0.2_all.deb[fi
Could you please send the list of the dirs to include in the backup just
like you specified them into simple-backup-config ? If the names of
those are confidential, just give them another name. What I would like
to have is the directory structure.
--
sbackup is very slow when working on many file
The main problem in this case is, sbackup seems to relly on the
integrity of the flist file to decide if a backup has succeeded. But
this file is created first (before to perform the backup)
--
[Whislist] Sbackup should report when a backup fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106155
You receive
Got this when sending a crash report to launchpad.
** Attachment added: "_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8317944/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash
--
[GUTSY] firefox-bin crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122205
You received this bug not
Here is another one
** Attachment added: "ccsm.1000.crash"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8317951/_usr_bin_ccsm.1000.crash
--
ccsm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_prepare()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Setting it as comfirmed (as KyleYankan can reproduce it)
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[Feisty] Sbackup doesn't save recommended settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106820
You receiv
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Attachment added: "debdiff patch"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7451026/sbackup.debdiff
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bu
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
works on feisty version 0.10.3-0.1
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
simple-backup-config doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79302
You received this bug notification because you are
setting as In progress
We'll include your patch in the next build.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
Backups with very many files make simple-restore-gnome very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeError in
on_main_radio_group_changed()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
You received this bug notification b
hi,
do you mean it would be cool to have the 'minor' number ?
Usually that number indicates bugfixes or minor improvments . It would be
difficult to update the GUI following those.
You might want to use synaptic or 'dpkg --status sbackup' to see the
precise version .
--
Info entry gives incomp
setting as Rejected
Feel free to reoppen if it's a true issue.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
Info entry gives incomplete version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74963
You received this bug n
This is reproducible by calling : sudo sbackupd --anyNonValideOption .
This shouldn't raise an exception (even though one isn't supposed to call
sbackupd manually.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with GetoptError in long_has
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
backup on other device not possible (not root?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Hi
Actually, /dev/xxx are devices that are used by mounting them into
directories (usually /media/xxx on Ubuntu ) . so it 's normal to see
/media/xxx instead of /dev/xxx .
Sbackup doesn't check for disk usage. That should be filled as a
wishlist in a new Bug. Please feel free to open a new bug wi
Same for me
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Duplicate directories allowed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74228
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
I can understand the problem (sbackup not giving informations about its precise
status at a certain time ) . But since it's in the background , how could it ?
Do you think that adding a feature that permit the user to ask for sbackup
status is a good solution ?
As for the 100% CPU usage,
0.10.3 is now in feisty and edgy and fixes this.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Dapper -> Edgy failure: sbackup configuration file has conflicts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63354
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Thank you for your patch.
I'll make the change.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Rejected => In Progress
** Also affects: sbackup (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: sbackup (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ou
Fixed upstream.
** Changed in: sbackup (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Info entry gives incomplete version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74963
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
[Feisty] Sbackup doesn't save recommended settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106820
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Hi,
I have studied your proposition (with libnotify) but I think it isn't
possible cause Sbackupd is launched by the root . To get a notification,
it seems that one has to launch a Gnome session under its ID (which is
never the case ) . Anyway I think that is to be classify as a wishlist
. And we
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Duplicate directories allowed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74228
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
This regex isn't valid . And so is the one in the "sbackup.conf"
default file (/home/.mozilla/.+/Cache/) .
Reopening the bug.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
Should it exclude browser cache files by default?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46015
You
Your patch has been included .
Thank you
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Backups with very many files make simple-restore-gnome very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110113
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Fixed upstream
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sbackup (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification bec
Fixed upstream
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug cont
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeError in
on_main_radio_group_changed()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is th
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Info entry gives incomplete version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74963
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Fixed upstream . I thought about also rejectiong the inclusion ( like
"/home/me/my/" and "/home/me/my/dir/" ) but in some case it my be useful
( like include "/home/me/my/" and "/home/me/my/dir/inc/" , exclude
"/home/me/my/dir/ can make sense )
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Pro
Fixed Upstream . Now , when you select a time (!= never) the radio
button is toggled automatically to "custom backup settings". If you
toggle it back to 'manual backup only' the time is set to "Never"
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Aigars Mahinovs
Would this one be good ?
/home/[^/]+?/\..+/[cC]ache
This patern matches any /home/users/.mydir cache or Cache dir . This
includes much of software cache,
** Summary changed:
- Should it exclude browser cache files by default?
+ Sbackup should exclude browser cache files by default?
--
Sbackup
Fixed upstream. all cache dir are excluded by default.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Aigars Mahinovs => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Sbackup should exclude browser cache files by default?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46015
You received th
Hi
Thank you for your bug report.
could you please tell me the version of sbackup you use.
Hint (Use this command to know it):
dpkg-query -s sbackup
wattazoum
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
backup folder is inaccessible
https://bugs.launchpad.net
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96807 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96807
Thank you for your report.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96807
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with NoSectionError in get()
--
crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112621
You receiv
install file for people that want to help testing the new version .
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.4beta1_all.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7564065/sbackup_0.10.4beta1_all.deb
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with NotFoundError in upgrade_v13()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95267
You
I have tested it with the new build and everything seems fine. If you
want to help testing I will attach a ".deb" to install.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with
Fixed upstream. If you want to confirm , please try the file provide in Bug
#95267 and confirm it here.
Thank you.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with EOFError in upgrade_tdir()
Thanks a lot :-)
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with NotFoundError in upgrade_v13()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
Hi,
I don't think it's a problem actually. Since Sbackup is actually only
usable by root, it's been decided that the only on that should be able
to have access to the backup snapshot should be him. That's why the
backup dir is closed.
Then since VFAT doesn't handle permissions well, after you rebo
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
sbackup is very slow when working on many files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102577
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
Hi,
i have tested your patches and the speed is very impressive. I have
integrate your patches as they are for now .
Thank you
--
sbackup is very slow when working on many files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102577
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Fixed upstream
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
sbackup is very slow when working on many files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102577
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Fixed upstream. If you're interested in testing it please use that link
:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/102577/comments/12
Please confirm that it's what you wanted.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Statu
If you're interested in testing the actual version of sbackup . Here is
an attachement :
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:56:34 +0200
Source: sbackup
Binary: sbackup
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.4beta2
Distribution: feisty
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aigars Mahinovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
le" line in sbackup.conf , the lock file will go to
/var/lock/
- for a fresh install , there is nothing to do (the lockfile is set to
/var/lock/sbackup.lock )
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => Fix Commi
If you want to test and confirm that it has been fixed , here is a file
to install
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.4beta3_all.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7584489/sbackup_0.10.4beta3_all.deb
--
sbackup lock not stored in /var/lock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82992
You received t
Hi,
please try with the file given there :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/82992/comments/4
I believe we have fix the problem. It would be nice if you could confirm that
it's fixed (or not :-) ).
so that I'll work on that one.
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError even when the "tes
;
file . The existance of this file , in the new version, shows that a
backup is complete. Otherwise the snapshot is not and should be delete.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ouattara Aziz
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError even when the "test" works in remote backup site
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubu
here is the version fixed
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.10.4beta4_all.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7586096/sbackup_0.10.4beta4_all.deb
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError even when the "test" works in remote backup site
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67814
You received this bug notification b
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sbackup
to reproduce:
launch simple-backup-config : sudo simple-backup-config
then toggle the first tab radio buttons and look on the shell :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/simple-backup-config", line 490, in
on_main_radio_group_c
Here is my patch for that functionality :
Changelog :
===
* GUI changes :
* added 2 radio boxes ('simply' and 'precisely' on the Time Tab ) 'Simply'
will use anacron, 'precisely' will be the old behaviour
* simple-backup-config :
* Code cleaned to prevent warnings about non existing G
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sbackup
Reproduce :
===
sudo simple-backup-config
toggle Recommended setting radio box and hit the save button.
Look at the shell :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/simple-backup-config", line 399, in on_save_clicked
tail =
** Attachment added: "screenshot 2 - precisely option checked"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7334546/Screenshot-Backup%20Properties-1.png
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Attachment added: "screenshot 1 - simply option checked"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7334534/Screenshot-Backup%20Properties.png
--
[Whislist] Let Sbackup use anacron over cron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
see Bug #106153 . I have attached a patch that fixes this. The fix
consists just in cleaning the code up.
--
[apport] simple-backup-config crashed with AttributeError in
on_main_radio_group_changed()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104294
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Do you have any clue on how to reproduce this bug ?
--
[apport] sbackupd crashed with KeyError in btree_r_add()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105168
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
It might be interesting to look at
http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/tau/home.php
--
sbackup is very slow when working on many files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102577
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Fixed with Feisty RC cd (15-Apr-2007)
--
Xserver-xorg doesn't recognize my ATI card anymore
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88482
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
Fixed on Feisty RC cd (15-Apr-2007) . Must have been a problem with my
graphic card settings
--
Compiz doesn't display my display control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
u
Public bug reported:
Actually, when you launch any GTK application on the shell, there is a "GTK
Accessibility Module initialized" message.
Then try tu use Zenity :
URL=`zenity --entry --title="Subversion: Checkout" --text="Enter
repository URL:" --entry-text="svn://" --width=400 `
the URL var
New patch including the last one and :
* the python files have been rename in *.py and the Make file has been changed
to be compliant (links are created into BIN without the py extention)
* A bug about a non removal of a cron link when switching to "Never" in the
time Tab has been corrected.
The question is : why is vlc the only one that is having this problem ?
are others using another library ?
And some of the users commenting this bug do not get any improvement by
changing the output lib to OSS or ESD ( those are alternative to alsa ) .
I can accept it as rejected on vlc side onl
HI,
apparently, gnomevfs couldn't login to your web site , I suspect that
the ftp is configured to just get 1 connection at a time and that
gnomevfs is trying to open another one.
do you know if there is a user connections limitation on your ftp ?
--
gnomevfs.NotFoundError even when the "test"
Hi,
I guess sbackup error report is confusing and I am aware of that. I
think your problem is really about connection limitation. but actually
Sbackud (in simple-backup-config ) report and error about writability
for any problem that occurs and prevent it to write (or even access the
target ).
Ba
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mozilla-thunderbird
i am using gmane nntp server. and I get a crash every time I want to see
the mails. Apport doesn't catch it even though it's a SEGV.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla-thunderbird
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
DOUBLE-CLICK: 400 -->
** Attachment added: "Video of this crash"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237293/out.ogg
--
[feisty] Thunderbird crashes and apport doesn't act
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubun
Public bug reported:
I have just bought a new DVD burner and installed it on my system, but
Ubuntu doesn't show it in the computer place. When I insert a cd inside
, it doesn't recognize it :( .
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
New DVD Burner not app
I forgot to mention that I have tried on edgy and Feisty .
--
New DVD Burner not appearing.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90666
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
lshw shows me that :
The New burner is :
--
TSSTcorpCD/DVDW SH-S182D
/0/e000/11.1/0/1
product: TSSTcorpCD/DVDW SH-S182D
bus info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
logical name: /dev/hdb
capabilities:
ATAPI packet device
--
The old is :
--
DVDRW DRW-3S165
/0/e000/11.1/1/0
product: DVDRW DRW-3S16
> If you don't link the CD icon to the physical drive, it makes sense. The
> icons you see are the CD's (hence the CD icon) and not the drive. If no
> CD / DVDs are in the drives, you should see no CD icons in the
> 'Computer' folder.
Thanks for your help .
When I have no cd inside , I still have
101 - 200 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
