I manually set the icon to file:
/usr/share/icons/crystalsvg/scalable/apps/basket.svg
to resolve this problem.
--
BasKet Launcher Icon Missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
-
I finally had enough and decided to give Ubuntu 7.04 a try. xfs is
stable in 7.04. And the entire system seems NOTICEABLY faster running
7.04 rather than 7.10.
I discovered the Ubuntuzilla project, thus was able to get current TBird
(and Firefox as well while I was at it) in 7.04.
http://ubuntuzil
I ended up reloading to Ubuntu 7.04 - OUTSTANDING RESULTS!!! The systems
run noticeably faster. Able to have xfs filesystem (other than /boot
which is ext3). I found a project for Ubuntu downloading the latest
binaries of Firefox and Thunderbird direct from Mozilla. Vista Business
in a Parallels VM
Due to bugs "133786 Bus error when running Firefox or Epiphany" and
"179238 xfs corruption - Clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and
applying latest updates" I refuse to give Ubuntu 7.10 another chance.
Due to those errors I was researching how to get testing with Hardy, and
last eveni
I just had quite a fight with a clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and
applying the updates makes Firefox no longer start.
Turned out the solution was to mark the Firefox related packages to be
reinstalled. Complete details in this thread.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=641027#td_post_4
Oh and yes, I have all partitions as xfs other than /boot which is ext3.
Ditto for on one of my clean re-installations Gnome Terminal would not
start as well. This most recent reload, however, that trouble has not
popped up.
--
Bus error when running Firefox or Epiphany
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
Installing on a clean hard drive, ext3 on /boot and all others xfs, I am
suspecting strange xfs filesystem corruption.
I discovered this due to trouble with Firefox and also Gnome Terminal.
One bug report in particular found a bumper crop of people encountering
this trouble,
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11090041/dmesg.log
--
xfs corruption - Clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and applying latest updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11090043/lspci-vvnn.log
--
xfs corruption - Clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and applying latest updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11090044/uname-a.log
--
xfs corruption - Clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and applying latest updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: "version.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11090045/version.log
--
xfs corruption - Clean install of 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon and applying latest updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Since Hardy 8.04 is going to be a LTS release, I find it odd that Ubuntu
has not moved to the 5.2.5 version which per www.php.net was released
back on 08-Nov-2007.
Could someone please shed some light on this point? Thanks!
--
[php5] [CVE-2007-4887] possible denial of service
https://bugs.launch
Sigurd Hogsbro: It is not specific to the AM64 version. A friend of mind
is running 7.10 AM64 and is having NO troubles at all. For me the x86
version of 7.10 was a nightmare.
I tried installing 7.10 on all ext3 partitions, better but not perfect.
Performance got much better when I dropped back to
The BasKet package seems to come with so many icons already, I guess you
are the better judge.
As I reported earlier, that particular file is at least a better icon
for the launcher than what it is currently. I went with the svg icon
rather than a png as svg seems to be re-sizable and I know Gnome
I am very disappointed to see no activity on this xfs corruption issue.
I did some initial testing with Hardy Heron and as far as I can tell
there is no similar corruption issue.
I am getting the impression that the x.10 releases of Ubuntu are to be
avoided. I logged a but against 6.10 which was
I have tested again with Ubuntu Desktop / Server 7.04 and both
installers successfully install with /boot being ext3 and all the other
partitions xfs.
I assume the answer would be "migrate to 7.04" - this bug report seems
to be a dead issue for Ubuntu.
--
6.10 Installer refuses due to xfs
https:
Public bug reported:
I have tried installing Xubuntu and Ubuntu (both @ 6.10).
/boot of either ext2 or ext3
All others xfs, but swap of course
It will not continue installing, grumbling that root can not be xfs...
but that is exactly why I made /boot ext3!
With the Xubuntu installer: Thinking i
Clarification:
Xubuntu 6.10 I was installing on a clean HDD. First selected ext2 for
/boot. Upon finishing the partition setup, all partitions were xfs,
including /boot. Later when I blew all the partitions away and selected
ext3 for boot, then / was ext3 but /boot was still incorrectly xfs. Thus
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:35:13 -, Colin Watson wrote:
>Upgrading to ubiquity 1.2.6 from edgy-proposed would clear it
>up if so.
One question about this part... I downloaded ISO CD images, so how then
shall I go about upgrading the file?
I will start on the recreates.
Thanks,
Michael
Following are the files from the 6.10 over 5.10...
** Attachment added: "messages, partman, syslog"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5843737/80765-6.10over5.10
--
6.10 Installer refuses due to xfs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80765
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
I have retested with Xubuntu 6.10, going directly for ext3 format for
/boot. IT WORKED! So maybe it is when ext2 is first selected, or, or,
or... maybe the installer just got confused as I wiped the disk clean
and repartitioned so many times.
--
6.10 Installer refuses due to xfs
https://launchpad
So maybe it was having originally selected ext2, as you can reproduce
the Kubuntu bug. I had that as one possible answer in the back of my
mind. I have that box busy at the moment, but if needed I could make it
available to recreate as well.
--
6.10 Installer refuses due to xfs
https://launchpad.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Recent daily builds of Lucid have errored trying to format partitions as
xfs. Today we tracked that problem down to the absence of mkfs.xfs which
in turn indicated that package xfsprogs is missing on the install /
LiveCD.
Indeed "dpkg -l | grep
>>the first daily after RC should include these packages again.
What does that mean? Should the packages be in tomorrow's daily?
--
xfsprogs,jfsutils missing from install / live CD, can not use XFS,jfs during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568024
You received this bug notification
I verified that the following syntax which the dnscache-run.preinst
script uses when creating ID's is correct to get the missing / needed
account.
adduser --quiet --system --force-badname --shell /bin/false --group
--home /nonexistent --no-create-home Gtinydns
So the diff attached in #3 should in
Thanks for the explanation Colin.
So did this fix make it into the RC release then since it does not sound
like it is done yet?
--
xfsprogs,jfsutils missing from install / live CD, can not use XFS,jfs during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568024
You received this bug notification
Aaahhh, Bryce / Felix... I am confused. All of these posts, and now you
flip the status to confirmed?
And I was installing VB from the vendor repo, not the Ubuntu repo.
I said that as of the 20100326 all problems are now RESOLVED.
(shrug)
--
X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Dr
I only knew of installing them via the iso image... the iso that is
installed during the VB install. So that is what I was referring to.
I am running the non-OSE VB from the VB repo... VB PUEL edition... as
stated originally.
--
X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is instal
I had not noticed the .4 to .6 rev in what my machine pulled down from
the VB repo. Indeed that is the case.
Agreed that 3.1.6 is needed in the Ubuntu repo. Thanks! :-)
--
X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540015
You received t
To follow up, I have added a "start daemontools" to my /etc/rc.local
script. 'tis good duct tape for now.
--
Please sponsor 0.76-3ubuntu1 into karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368918
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This also affects the Lucid alpha with all available updates, then I:
sudo apt-get install djbdns dnscache-run
No Gtinydns account was created.
I went ahead and created the ID myself so that progress could continue.
I then edited the various files directly to make it consistent with the
other ID
I am very surprised just come across this with fully up-to-date Lucid.
Please see attached screen capture.
Next I will try to set this bug back to a state where someone will take
a look at it again.
** Attachment added: "Lucid_WrongNetworkPrinterFirewallInstructions.png"
http://launchpadlibra
I seem to have dupe reported this bug here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570398
Lower number... I guess I won, just was not noticed.
--
[Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570765
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@sonal Kumar Jain #114
>Should I try grub legacy (old grub)??
Absolutely not! Grub2 has been the Ubuntu standard since 9.10. Should
stay with the common direction and get this bug resolved. Thank you!
--
[Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5707
@Oliver Grawert #110
One bug I opened against Lucid I even fixed the bug attaching a diff to
fix the script. No one ever touched that bug.
So "attaching things" does not guarantee action.
--
[Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570765
You receiv
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Using the 20100419.1 image of Lucid.
I started by installing WinXP Pro SP3 to the front of the HDD in a
system, intending to add Lucid behind it.
Upon trying to create a partition in Lucid's advanced partitioner, it
responds "Error! Unable to s
Further, the trouble is that I use Linux to image Windows, however
Windows must be installed FIRST, else it will refuse to touch the disk.
Once I have Windows + Linux installed, am able to backup the Windows
image, then yes in production mode Linux does come first and is able to
build nice / neat
Resolution confirmed. I installed WinXP SP3 first, then Lucid behind XP.
The daily CD image 20100426.1 allowed me to do so.
Thank you SO MUCH for getting that fixed!
--
Partitioner throws "Unable to satisfy all constraints" when trying to use
previously created partitions
https://bugs.launchpa
I just re-tested this issue with the 20100426.1 daily image. Broken even
a bit worse than last reported against 9.10.
Today's /boot/grub/grubenv file after just rebooting from Windows shows:
# GRUB Environment Block
###
So noticeably missing the saved_entry= data
While it was working in ear
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub2
I just added Lucid 20100426.1 to a WinXP Pro SP3 system in free space
left behind Windows.
Windows XP was not on the grub boot menu initially after loading.
I updated Linux, then set to customizing Grub. Upon running update-grub,
I saw WinXP added
I re-tested this condition today using the 20100426.1 ISO image of
Lucid.
I am please to report that in two test configurations tested, the
problem is completely / successfully resolved.
One test was on real hardware. The second test was in a VirtualBox VM
environment.
I will get onto retesting
I re-tested this condition today using the 20100426.1 ISO image of
Lucid.
I am please to report that in the test configuration tested, the problem
is completely / successfully resolved.
The test was in a VirtualBox VM environment.
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS par
Fix confirmed for the xfs filesystem with the 20100426.1 iso build.
--
xfsprogs,jfsutils missing from install / live CD, can not use XFS,jfs during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
@NickMax #7
Now I have added GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=1 and put back GRUB_DEFAULT=saved.
Booted to Windows XP, upon reboot it is set to the top Grub menu choice
which is Ubuntu.
Really odd that it would take Grub2 TWO entries in order to get it to
save the last booted OS choice... and that GRUB_SAVEDEFA
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Alpha testing with the Lucid x86 ISO image on 20100219, the step to
configure partitions is missing from the installer. Talk on IRC is that
question has been taken out, that Ubuntu desktop will install on a
single partition, plus swap. NO NO NO N
I utilized the alternate CD from today (20100219) to at least get
something installed. I was able to do the custom partitioning I wanted
to, however the text mode installer is rather undesirable knowing how
good Ubuntu's GUI installer has been. Took me quite a while to discover
the Alternate CD's t
** Summary changed:
- Mount a Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition R+W, reboot to Windows hang at mup.sys
+ Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, ha
I am working on a broblem found during Lucid alpha testing with the
support people at the NTFS-3G project. However, it seems to be turning
into a grub2 bug and not ntfs-3g related. Please see the discussion
thread here:
"ntfsclone makes Windows 2000 partition not boot after imagin"
http://tuxera.c
Trying to add grub, ntfs3g support seems to think this is caused by
grub.
** Package changed: linux-ntfs (Ubuntu) => grub (Ubuntu)
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988
You received this bug
FYI johnjohn: This is due to compiz taking over as the window manager.
You may restore the desired behavior by "System \ Preferences \
Appearance \ Visual Effects tab, and setting the value to None. That
disables compiz and restores functionality.
--
drag'n'drop not work workspace switcher
https:
Confirmed today that this problem is unique to Windows 2000 (w/ SP4) and
does NOT affect Windows XP Pro w/ SP3.
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988
You received this bug notification becaus
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub
I started a thread at ubuntuforums.org first, please see:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1354257
Discussions went round and round... finally tried viewing the contents
of file: "cat (hdX,Y)/boot/grub/grubenv" via the Grub shell and the
co
Public bug reported:
I hand install Windows (Windows 2000 w/ SP4) to two partitions at the front of
the drive.
Next install Ubuntu 9.10 behind Windows.
Apply Ubuntu OS updates, install ntfsprogs, reboot
I backup the image of Windows using ntfsclone
I reboot into Windows, and the boot hangs at M
** Attachment added: "Initial boot hang"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38014370/Screenshot-win2k.test2k%20%5BRunning%5D%20-%20Sun%20VirtualBox%20-%20Boot%20Hang.png
--
ntfsclone backup a Windows 2000 SP4 partition, reboot to Windows hang at mup.sys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988
You
Detail of boot hang
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-win2k.test2k [Running] - Sun VirtualBox - Boot
Hang Details.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38014371/Screenshot-win2k.test2k%20%5BRunning%5D%20-%20Sun%20VirtualBox%20-%20Boot%20Hang%20Details.png
--
ntfsclone backup a Windows 2000 SP4
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
I am attempting to test our standard scenario for a dual boot
configuration with 10.04 Alpha 2, and have run into a new show stopper
bug.
As you can see from the screen capture, Windows is installed to the
front of the drive on two partitions: O
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-win2k.test2k [Running] - Sun VirtualBox -
Partitioner not making the boot partition.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38160911/Screenshot-win2k.test2k%20%5BRunning%5D%20-%20Sun%20VirtualBox%20-%20Partitioner%20not%20making%20the%20boot%20partition.png
--
Lu
I backed up a couple of screens and was able to complete the install via
the "use the largest continuous free space" option during partitioning.
Manual partitioning was impossible. would not accept a larger /boot
partition, would not accept a 10G / partition type Ext4, nadda!
Also: Taking the "us
I just recreated this issue using Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2.
I did not even need to use ntfsclone to break the partition... merely
added the Windows partitions to my fstab in read/write mode, reboot into
Linux, reboot again into Windows and Windows 2000 will no longer boot.
Seems to me that read/write
I just now tested this issue against Lucid Alpha 2 and that release
works properly. Booting to Windows, rebooting, Windows is then the
default grub entry.
Thus I think this only is a bug in Ubuntu 9.10.
Hope that narrows the bug down. Now for getting it squashed! ;-)
--
Ubuntu 9.10 DEFAULT=save
Subscribe
@Sebastien, even if it is an upstream "choice", it is wrong. This should
be put back immediately.
--
Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
@Sebastien: Request to report to the Gnome developers done:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608523
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #608523
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608523
--
Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50863
Updated the description to reflect the more simplistic way which this
bug may be recreated.
Again, how may I assist further?
** Summary changed:
- ntfsclone backup a Windows 2000 SP4 partition, reboot to Windows hang at
mup.sys
+ Mount a Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition R+W, reboot to Windows ha
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I already logged this bug at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608525 but also here against
Lucid Alpha 2 with all patches applied. Copying the original bug report
text here as well...
=
I like to create multiple Nautil
I just confirmed this problem with Ubuntu 9.10 which also has grub2.
Same result.
I think this needs to get escalated to where ever grub2 comes to Ubuntu
from, correct? Please advise. Thanks.
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
I found where Grub2 comes from, and opened a bug report here:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?29002
referencing this bug report.
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988
You received t
I retested with the A3 release, and indeed the partitioning questions
are back.
I found that zsync creates a new ISO file, does not modify the existing
ISO. That is the explanation for why the zsync downloaded but did not
appear to have done anything.
Looking good - keep up the great work! :-)
-
I just retested this on a clean install of Lucid Alpha 3, and the
Gtinydns account is still missing.
Could this get added before Lucid ships, please??!?!? :-)
--
Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518393
You received this bug notification because
I think this diff should correctly create the missing ID needed to set
up tinydns within the djbdns system.
Could a maintainer please assist us with this and consider for inclusion
in Lucid. Thanks!
** Attachment added: "dnscache-run.preinst.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39858936/dnscach
Issue resolved with Lucid Alpha 3 release.
--
Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a /boot
partition behind existing ones
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
This dual-boot problem seems to be getting worse, not better, between
Alpha 2 and Alpha 3.
With Alpha 2, Windows XP worked whereas Windows 2000 would fail to boot.
Now with Alpha 3, Windows XP also fails to boot when Linux is added to
the back
** Attachment added: "DualBootLucidA3-XPCrash.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39890603/DualBootLucidA3-XPCrash.png
--
Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Log file that goes along with the crash screen.
** Attachment added: "VBox.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39890617/VBox.log
--
Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
** Summary changed:
- Installing Lucid Alpha 2 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
+ Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partiti
** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer
boots, hang at mup.sys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
@Colin: So what is the real story then?
--
Custom partitioning no longer possible with main ISO image
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
I updated my ISO as follows:
zsync -i ./lucid-desktop-i386_20100222.iso http://cdimage.ubuntu.com
/daily-live/20100222/lucid-desktop-i386.iso.zsync
After making a copy of the iso image to the new datestamp filename. The
last update from zsync was as follows:
downloading from
http://cdimage.ubun
Solution to this problem:
sudo apt-get install xtightvncviewer
That package is a "plug-in" to the Terminal Server Client which adds VNC
support.
Again, I suggested it before, please add xtightvncviewer to the list of
suggested / recommended packages in the Terminal Server Client
(TSClient) packa
I tried the three apt-get commands, and the install produced the
following output:
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall mono-git libmagickcore1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package mono-git
Going in Aptitude, I do n
With the corrected package name - error seems to yet persist... (All
thanks to Update Notifier getting caught in the gears of Aptitude
working. ggg. head shaking... do I need to open a separate bug
against what I observed Update Notifier doing here?)
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall mono
Woo hoo! That finally resolved the errors! Thanks so much, Jean-
Baptiste!
--
Loaded new 9.04 box, applied updates, libmagickcore1 and mono-jit have issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
The ooRexx developers figured out that this problem was due to a bug in
how the C/C++ code was compiling. Some code specifically for AIX was
ending up in the Linux builds. They are releasing an updated version,
4.0.1 soon that has this corrected. I have verified the fix on a 9.10
and 10.04 box.
Yo
Subscribe
Seems this bug is actually the root cause of one I turned in:
"Creating a GUI shortcut to a Samba share, password dialog never appears, PID's
stuck in process list"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/538250
--
gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places-
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Installed a Lucid lucid-desktop-i386_20100316.iso guest OS on my
VirtualBox PUEL installed via the vendor repository onto an Ubuntu 9.04
i386 host OS. The version has been: 3.1.4-57640_Ubuntu_jaunty for a
little while now.
Recently I had no trouble
Please find attached the requested files.
I provided all Xorg log files that existed in this VM.
** Attachment added: "540015-logs.zip"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41124640/540015-logs.zip
--
X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Oh, and no customizations to the xorg.conf. Clean install of Lucid, run
the VB Guest Addons install, reboot, X will not start.
--
X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540015
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Working on it. My main Lucid VM session somehow lost the NIC driver. I
was thinking to pull down an updated daily in order to properly retest.
I will start the pull now of the ISO... "no fooling".
--
Creating a GUI shortcut to a Samba share, password dialog never appears, PID's
stuck in process
Oh wow... the window controls are back to the top/right corner where
they should be. Wow! Wow! Wow! :-) Thank you, Ubuntu!
And yes, this Samba connection via the GUI interface issue is confirmed
resolved. Thank you for getting this nasty trouble taken care of.
--
Creating a GUI shortcut to a Sam
daemontools appears to have been autostarted in Ubuntu Server 9.10. I
did not need to start it manually in the /etc/rc.local file. I have not
yet looked into how exactly it is autostated on 9.10, but thought to
post this as a FYI for others.
--
Please sponsor 0.76-3ubuntu1 into karmic
https://bug
Tested with a clean VM load of the Lucid alpha today - 20100312. Still
the same problem.
At boot up, the start_daemon does not fork the new pid, hangs the
script, prevents the machine from getting to the tty1 login prompt.
Kill the rxapi process, start script exits normally.
Manually start / sto
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Recent daily releases of Lucid, starting around the Alpha 3 release, I
am unable to connect to a Samba share via the GUI / Nautilus method.
The initial screen seems to work properly, I fill in:
server
share
user
domain
and click "connect".
Wh
I did a recreate using the daily ISO from 20100312. Now WinXP boots to
the desktop, then crashes VirtualBox so hard that a VirtualBox crash
screen comes up, pressing the OK button closes VirtualBox. So, progress,
not prefect.
First attaching a zip file containing more than what was asked for in
th
The Windows XP running in VirtualBox crash screen.
** Attachment added: "winxp.testxp_WindowsXPCrash.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40913882/winxp.testxp_WindowsXPCrash.png
--
Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
You recei
The VirtualBox log that the crash dialog referenced.
** Attachment added: "VBox.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40913888/VBox.log
--
Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
You received this bug notification because you are a
I did a recreate using the daily ISO from 20100312. Booting Win2K still
seems to hang at the same spot as previously. WinXP gets further into
the boot process with the 20100312 build of Ubuntu, Win2K does not get
that far.
Attaching the log files requested in Bug # 529654
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Completely understood now. Thank you for your explanations of what goes
on behind the curtain! :-)
--
xfsprogs,jfsutils missing from install / live CD, can not use XFS,jfs during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Being the impatient type, I used my 20100419.1 LiveCD, added the Lucid
package of xfsprogs, and the installation went through beautifully. Now
on to other testing.
--
xfsprogs,jfsutils missing from install / live CD, can not use XFS,jfs during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568024
Four samples getting attached. First two are from Ubuntu 9.04 which
works properly. Second two will be from 10.04 where the error shows up
ONLY in presentation mode. Fortunately I was able to capture the problem
I was talking about within presentation mode.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-BoldTec
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-OpenOffice.org 3.0-PresentationMode.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49398355/Screenshot-OpenOffice.org%203.0-PresentationMode.png
--
Font becomes fuzzy in presentation mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910
You received this bug notification because y
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-BoldTechnicalFontTest.odp - OpenOffice.org
Impress.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49398399/Screenshot-BoldTechnicalFontTest.odp%20-%20OpenOffice.org%20Impress.png
--
Font becomes fuzzy in presentation mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910
You recei
101 - 200 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
